Support for LAist comes from
We Explain L.A.
Stay Connected

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

State Bill that Would Ban City Traffic Fines Moves Forward

sb949-citations.jpg
Photo by Lucyrk in LA via LAist Featured Photos/Flickr
We need to hear from you.
Today during our spring member drive, put a dollar value on the trustworthy reporting you rely on all year long. The local news you read here every day is crafted for you, but right now, we need your help to keep it going. In these uncertain times, your support is even more important. We can't hold those in power accountable and uplift voices from the community without your partnership. Thank you.

California's Senate on Friday unanimously passed a bill that would benefit state coffers, but leave cities with fewer dollars to collect when motorists get cited. Authored by Long Beach Democrat Sen. Jenny Oropeza, SB 949 would prohibit cities from citing motorists under city law instead of already existing state law, which allowed municipalities to keep fines. Opponents say it's just another way for the state to balance its dwindling budget on the backs of cities. Supporters say police shouldn't be motivated by generating revenue for the city, but rather by protecting the public. A portion of citations go back to the city to cover costs of officer's time and resources for a traffic stop.

Not a surprise; the city of Los Angeles, which has its own budget woes, officially opposes the legislation. City Councilmembers add an interesting twist to their reasoning: if it doesn't go through the state process, tickets from red light photo enforcement could be lowered from over $500 to $150.

Most Read