Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Fluffy & Fido Must Be Snipped, It's the Law
()
Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa signed one of the country's most stringent pet sterilization laws yesterday, requiring dog and cat owners to spay/neuter their pets or face hefty fines.
What does this mean for you and fido or fluffy? It means that you must have them spayed or neuteured by the time they reach four months of age.
All dogs? All cats? Pretty much. The only animals exempted from the new law are those that compete in shows, are rescue or service animals, or that are registered as a pet used for breeding.
Support for LAist comes from
What will happen if you don't? First time offenders will receive information about the law and they'll be given 60 days to spay/neuter their pets. A second offense gets you a $100 fine and 8 hours of community service. A third offense gets you a $500 fine "or" 40 hours of community service.
How can they possibly enforce this? Ah, the most important question. Will there be a new brigade of "ball police" roaming the streets of LA? Can you be given a ticket for Harry's hanging sack whilst walking for your morning coffee? What about the ladies? You can't tell just by looking at them. The big trick in all of this is how to enforce such a measure.
Anyone with half a brain can see that over-population of our animal shelters must be controlled. While a few nuts may say let's kill 'em all instead, the obvious approach is to prevent all those new pups and kittens from being born in the first place. Much more humane, right?
This law is a win in many ways - that big jerk with his big husky that has the big balls and bosses everyone around will finally be snipped. Hooray for those of you who live next door to the big jerk. More importantly, stray animals can't mate and make more animals. Easy math.
There aren't many who disagree with this law in principle. Who wouldn't want to handle our animals in the most humane way possible?
But the big question is: how do you enforce such a law? Who will be monitoring the situation? Who will be policing the balls and uteruses of dogs and cats in LA? If you are a first-time offender and get a 60 day reprieve, will someone come knocking on your door to check on Day 61? What happens after the third infraction? Is someone able to just continue paying fines and doing community service indefinitely without spaying/neutering their pet? And is a $500 fine for a backyard breeder that earns up to $3,000 a dog really harsh enough?
Who will check to make sure "professional breeders" are really breeding and not just skirting the law? Who will make sure "show" dogs are really being shown? Do we have the resources to seriously enforce this? Can Animal Control officers really be everywhere at once, or is the goal to slowly check every dog they come into contact with and hope that the problem recedes over time?
Support for LAist comes from
The clearest picture we have right now is that this law will target the biggest offenders - the dog and cat owners who allow their animals to mate unchecked. City Councilmember Richard Alarcón said as much
"The problem in our city is not the animals but the human owners, and this ordinance will allow the Department of Animal services to target resources towards the worst offenders whose irresponsibility threaten public safety and fills our shelters with unwanted dogs and cats."
Makes sense on the surface and might be the right place to start. Yet, in a city where we can't manage to get people to license their dogs and cats, it seems a very challenging task to get them to alter their dogs and cats.
Opponents of the law are furious because they worry that it will encourage backyard breeders to to go "underground" to cheat the system, which could result in possibly more inhumane treatment of the animals, encourage breeding in a limited gene pool (resulting in genetic diseases) and more.
Is this a good thing for fluffy and fido? Right now, it looks like a decent place to start, considering that doing nothing will only allow the problems to multiply exponentially. It will take time to see how the law is enforced, how pet owners respond, and what unforseen problems may arise in the process. The law goes into effect in April.
What do you think about the mandatory spay/neuter law? How will this affect you and your pets?
Photo by S!za via Flickr
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake. -
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
Best of LAist