Support for LAist comes from
Local and national news, NPR, things to do, food recommendations and guides to Los Angeles, Orange County and the Inland Empire
Stay Connected
Listen

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Sean Penn Hates You For Hating His Interview With El Chapo

Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.

Oscar-winning journalist Sean Penn is talking about his exclusive, controversial and possibly life-threatening interview with Mexican drug lord Joaquín Guzmán Loera, better known to the world as "El Chapo." And he wants his critics (basically everyone who has read the piece) to shut up already, telling 60 Minutes' Charlie Rose, "I have a regret that the entire discussion about this article ignores its purpose, which was to try to contribute to this discussion about the policy in the War on Drugs."

Penn, aided by Mexican actress Kate del Castillo—El Chapo is her #1 fan—managed to speak to Guzman last October (but Penn wasn't taking notes), and later received a video of him answering questions. He also offered Guzman editorial approval of the story, which raised eyebrows. In his conversation with Rose, the actor-activist scoffed, "At the same time, you know, when...'journalists' who want to say that I'm not a journalist -- well, I want to see the license that says that they're a journalist."

While there's no license, media ethicist Kelly McBride wrote on Poynter that a strong editor would have helped the feature a lot:

During the actual writing, an editor should have been working with Penn to identify a structure, build a coherent argument and then challenge readers to see a complicated character operating in a complicated system. How do you do that? You have to bring in other voices. Here’s what’s missing from Penn’s El Chapo piece:
- A sociologist or economist. If you want to argue that American capitalism and social structures are partially culpable for the mob state that created El Chapo’s kingdom, bring in an economic expert who’s done research in this area.
- A law enforcement specialist. There are plenty of people who argue that America’s criminalization of drugs harms Mexico. But you can’t just toss that out as an accepted fact. Your readers deserve to hear about the successful experiments in decriminalization.
- Regional economic data. Rather than letting your source proclaim that there are no options, bring in some basic economic data that provide context.
- His neighbors. Penn claims El Chapo is a "Robin Hood-like figure" who improves life for the poor people of his hometown in his home state of Sinaloa. Let’s hear from them.
- A victim’s family. This may be the biggest stakeholder missing from the story.
- A Mexican newspaper editor, like this one. Cartels have terrorized journalists. Their voices would add some needed accountability.

Penn insists that everyone is missing the point, "Let's go to the big picture of what we all want. We all want this drug problem to stop. We all want them -- the killings in Chicago to stop. We are the consumer. Whether you agree with Sean Penn or not, there is a complicity there. And if you are in the moral right, or on the far left, just as many of your children are doing these drugs ... And how much time have they spent in the last week since this article come [sic] out, talking about that? One percent? I think that'd be generous."When asked by Rose, Penn believes that the Mexican government is saying he and del Castillo led them to El Chapo,
Support for LAist comes from
thereby putting their lives in jeopardy. Also, "My article failed."

As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.

Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.

We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.

No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.

Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.

Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist