One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Roman Polanski Will Have To Wait To Hear If He Can Avoid More Jail Time
Photo by Adam Nurkiewicz/Getty
Roman Polanski's attorney argued in front of a judge Monday morning that Roman Polanski has already faced enough prison time for his 1977 statutory rape case, according to the LA Times. The judge refused to make an immediate ruling and instead has 90 days to write an order on the case. The prison time the defense cites is a 42-day stint in 1977, after which Polanski fled the country to avoid returning for a longer prison stay, and the 10 months he spent in a Swiss prison while being detained in 2009. Polanski has been in the process of trying to prevent more time in custody since February.
Prior to today's meeting, Polanski's attorney Harland Braun asked the judge to reveal what type of sentencing he would give Polanski should he return to the United States and face trial. The judge denied the request, and prosecutors responded to the demands by saying "The defendant is, once again, trying to dictate the terms of his return without risk to himself." Braun had also made efforts to unseal the testimony of the first prosecutor who handled his case in 1977 in order to prove he has served more jail time than the original prosecution intended, according to the Hollywood Reporter.
In court today, Braun no longer made the argument to unseal this testimony, but he continued to argue that the prosecution divulge the type of sentencing they would seek should Polanski return to the U.S. The advance knowledge is integral to Braun's argument. According to City News Service, his original court filing read:
"Mr. Polanski asks this court to acknowledge that he was promised a
specific custody portion of his sentence by Judge Rittenband and he has more
than fulfilled the custody portion of his sentence," [...] "With
such assurance by this current court, Mr. Polanski will return to Los Angeles
to be sentenced."
He also asked the judge to sentence Polanski in absentia, according to the Hollywood Reporter. Deputy District Attorney Michele Hannisee objected to these requests, saying "The people simply do not believe it is in the best interests of justice to give a wealthy celebrity different treatment than any other fugitive from justice."In the 1990s, Polanski almost struck a deal with the D.A.'s office that would have prevented more prison time if he returned to the U.S. More recently, though the district attorney's office has said he could face two years in state prison should he return for sentencing, according to the LA Times.
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
