Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

NFL Tease? St. Louis Rams Owner Buys Land In Inglewood

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

The owner of an NFL team bought a plot of land fit for a stadium, once again teasing us with the possibility of a team coming to Los Angeles.

St. Louis Rams owner Stan Kroenke recently bought a plot of land between the closed Hollywood Park track and the newly-renovated Forum in Inglewood, the Los Angeles Times reports. The 60-acre plot can most likely fit a football stadium, but the Rams refuse to comment on what the land will be used for, according to the L.A. Business Journal.

The land has been owned by Walmart for years, and Kroenke just so happens to be married to one of the heiresses of the superstore fortune. Walmart tried to open a Supercenter on the property in 2004, but Inglewood residents flatly rejected them.

This is certainly a sizable leap for a team to make in regards to moving to the L.A. area. Many bigwigs in L.A. have been trying to lure a team here, and there have been two stadium ideas that have fizzled in the past—Farmer's Field at L.A. Live and a planned stadium all the way in the City of Industry.

Back in Missouri, all the pieces seem to be falling into place. Kroenke tried to develop an insanely expensive, taxpayer-funded $700 million stadium renovation that was trashed by the city in 2012, which could motivate Kroenke to look elsewhere for a team. There is also a very sneaky clause in the Rams' current lease that states that it becomes year-to-year if the Rams' stadium "isn't one of the league's eight best by the end of next season," according to Deadspin (How do they determine that, exactly?). Also, the Rose Bowl won a battle last week to host an NFL team if they begin construction on a new stadium.

Could these be the first few steps to bringing an NFL team back to Los Angeles?

Not so fast: there are still many hurdles to overcome. The Rams must attempt to negotiate another deal with St. Louis while they explore a move, the Times reports. They must also clear it with the NFL and receive a three-fourths majority vote from all the other teams in order to get the green light, in addition to a multitude of other legal mountains the Rams have to climb before they could even think of moving.

Sponsored message

Deadspin seems a little more cynical about the whole thing, claiming that this is all a game of chicken: the purchase of the land could be part of Kroenke's plan to scare St. Louis into approving a new stadium in their city.

If the plan goes through, it will be yet another bit of interesting news for the people of Inglewood. Whether or not residents will approve remains to be seen (it does sound like a nightmare for NIMBYs).

So, if you're excited about the prospect of the Rams moving to L.A., keep in mind that if Kroenke solidifies his move to L.A., it's still eons away from fruition. Just be happy the Jaguars aren't moving here.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today