This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
The L.A. Times Won A Pulitzer For Their San Bernardino Shooting Coverage
The L.A. Times was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for breaking news for their coverage of the San Bernardino terrorist attack on Monday.
A video from the Times newsroom shows raucous applause and a sea of giant grins. Speaking to his newsroom, L.A. Times editor-in-chief and publisher Davan Maharaj said "we owned the story." He praised his staff's work as epitomizing how news should be covered in the the digital age, with staffers providing tweets, breaking news alerts, great pictures, videos, and "everything in between." Maharaj also underscored the context of the victory: just two weeks before the attack the Times had lost 40 employees in a buyout, leaving many wondering how the paper would be able to manage powerful coverage.
The awards were announced at Columbia University. The Poynter Institute reports that the Pulitzer committee received 1,112 submissions in the various journalism categories.
As L.A. Observed noted, "Times staffers also were able to direct readers to the recent series on poverty in San Bernardino, a backgrounder to the locale that no one else had." L.A. Observed also offers a nice explainer on how the Times circumvented printing deadlines to include thorough and nuanced coverage in the paper on the morning after the shooting:
The question I heard from ex-Timespeople yesterday was, how would the San Bernardino story be handled in this morning's print paper given the 5:30 p.m. deadline for the A section, which allows the Times' printing plant in LA to print the newspapers of paying customers. The Times got around the deadline by renaming the California section as Times Extra and moving all of the shootings news there. That re-named section and Sports were then wrapped in front of the usual front page. There is a little bit of California and local news in the section, but it's heavily devoted to the shootings. Seven stories and a total of 29 different contributors and bylines, including Washington reporter Richard Serrano, who is taking the buyout. Serrano weighed in with the view from federal officials about the shooters.
The Times' San Bernardino coverage was previously honored by the Society of News Designers, who praised the paper's ability to include a "great mix of media types on deadline. It's really elegant with nice attention to details, purposeful editing, and thoughtful integration of multimedia." They were also named as a finalist for the American Society of News Editors's 2016 awards. The Times faced pushback from readers for the wall-to-wall reports, as well as what some readers felt was "aggrandizingly prominent coverage of the perpetrators." In a December column for the paper, Paul Thornton addressed the complaints and included excerpts from some of the letters.
Sponsored message
Other 2016 Pulitzer Prize winners include Kathryn Schulz for her New Yorker piece on the Cascadia fault line (Feature Writing), T. Christian Miller of ProPublica and Ken Armstrong of The Marshall Project for "An Unbelievable Story of Rape" (Explanatory Reporting), and Lin-Manuel Miranda for Hamilton (Drama).
The L.A. Times Metro desk's Sarah Parvini, who worked extensively on the story, tweeted a picture from the newsroom celebration:
Best Monday ever? #pulitzerprize pic.twitter.com/dLTwI8iykb
— Sarah Parvini (سارا) (@sarahparvini) April 18, 2016
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
