With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
LA Hate Flier Proposal Moves Forward

The Los Angeles City Council on Friday approved a proposal to examine how litter laws can be used to prohibit the dissemination of fliers that contain hate speech, with the motion calling specific attention to antisemitic literature.
The proposal comes amid worries about an increase in antisemitism as the Israel-Hamas war drags on.
“The perpetrators of this crime do so in the hope that it will harass and intimidate Jewish families, radicalize others or desensitize some to the messaging,” the motion states.
Councilmember Bob Blumenfield, who co-sponsored the motion with Councilmember Nithya Raman, said it is aimed at people who toss hate fliers on private — not public — property.
“When you cross that threshold and you start sending that hate into someone’s else’s sanctuary, onto their front step, that is no longer about your free speech,” he said. “That is about intimidating someone else.”
Blumenfield compared it to leaving a noose on the steps of a Black person’s home.
The motion asked the city attorney and Los Angeles Police Department to report back in a few months on “how the crime of littering in mass as a method to disseminate hate speech is currently addressed by the City.”
It also asked those agencies to look at ways to increase penalties that would make it a misdemeanor “for any person to litter with the intent to willfully injure, intimidate, interfere with, oppress, or threaten any other person based on their perceived characteristics.”
The Friday morning meeting was interrupted by pro-Palestinian protesters who said the motion was designed to silence their voices by conflating anti-Zionist sentiment with antisemitism.
“It's nothing more than this very targeted assault on a particular group of people for speaking out for the liberation of Palestinians,” said Hamid Khan, one of about 10 people who were escorted out of the meeting because of their protests.
First Amendment advocates have raised red flags over the motion, saying hate speech — absent a specific threat — is protected by the Constitution.
Blumenfield acknowledged as much.
“First Amendment issues are always complicated and we want to make sure that people can say whatever hateful things they want to say,” he said.
But, he added, “Surely if you send a hateful flier with the intent to intimidate someone, that is more than littering.”
The motion also sought to find a non-criminal approach to hate fliers. It asks the Civil and Human Rights and Equity Department to report to the council “on alternative solutions to preventing and addressing hate speech that is disseminated via mass flyering.”
The motion asks for reports back in 90 days.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.
-
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places.
-
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.