Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
City Finding New Ways to Keep Occupy LA Away From City Hall
Photo of the new lawn at City Hall as seen on March 28, 2012 by STERLINGDAVISPHOTO via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr
()
The refurbished grounds of Los Angeles' City Hall are expected to re-open in May, and already the City Council is working to clarify and adjust the park rules, which many believe is aimed at keeping Occupy LA protesters at bay.
On Wednesday, Councilman Jose Huizar introduced a new motion requesting the City Attorney draft an ordinance "that would 'help protect and maintain' the park by limiting the hours it's open to between 6 a.m. and 7 p.m. The previous hours of operation were 5 a.m. to 10 p.m.," reports the L.A. Times.
But wait, there's more:
Along with limiting how late people can be in the park, Huizar's proposal calls for new mechanisms to enforce park rules. It also asks the city attorney to "clarify the language and definition" as it relates to tents in the section of the city's municipal code that regulates parks.
Support for LAist comes from
Hmmm, tents?! Enforcing park rules?! Why would those issues be on the minds of our civic leaders?
The City gave the Occupy LA protesters a pass by letting them set up on the lawn at City Hall October 1, 2011; the group said they'd stay until at least December 1, and the City Council said they could stay as long as they wanted. Turns out they didn't mean that, and on the night of November 29, 2011, the city and the Los Angeles Police Department raided the encampment, arresting over 200 people, including many who were not even in the park or part of the encampment.
Occupy LA has long cried foul at the seeming two-faced actions of the Council, who toured the camp one day and passed a resolution in support of them, who then a few weeks later saw to their protest was going to come to a destructive end.
Following the eviction, protesters returned to City Hall to hold meetings, and to test the limits of law enforcement. Some arrests were made, but largely the aftermath has been peaceful. The park surrounding City Hall has been closed off, and the landscape treated to a nearly $400,000 rehab job.
Chery Aichele of Occupy LA told the L.A. Times she thinks the Council should be working to help people losing their homes, not focusing on tents in parks: "It's too bad the city is wasting time talking about tents when they should be doing everything they can do to save people's homes so they don't have to live in tents," she said.
"Are they really that afraid of another occupation? One of the cultural capitals of the world, may have a city hall park that closes at 7:00pm. Maybe they ought to start calling our city Los Diablos?" posted an Occupy LA member in regards to news of Huizar's motion on the Occupy Los Angeles Facebook page.
The full City Council is expected to hear Huizar's motion in the coming weeks.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist