Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Placement of Signals May Have Contributed to Chatsworth Train Crash

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

In 1996, 11 people died in Maryland when a regional commuter train slammed into an Amtrak train. It was largely blamed on distractions--the process of stopping at a station, loading passengers and starting up again--between the yellow and red signals. The engineer apparently forgot about the yellow warning and left the station at a high rate of speed, too much to stop at the junction where an Amtrak train was approaching.

Experts say the same thing may have contributed to the deadly Chatsworth Metrolink crash where the yellow signal is placed before the Chatsworth station and the red after the station. But Metrolink told the LA Times that they do not agree the placement can cause "potential distractions," even though the NTSB said the stopping at station includes "attention-demanding tasks." And despite Metrollink's refusal to agree that signal location played a role in the crash, they are reexamining signal locations.

After the Maryland crash, Metrolink said they added safety measures, but those appear to have been ignored the day of the Crash. Also, phone records indicate that train engineer Robert Sanchez was texting right before the crash that left 25 dead.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today