Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Lesbian Pepperdine Students Can Sue School Over Discrimination, Judge Says
Pepperdine University in Malibu (Photo by Shawn Park via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr)
()
A federal judge in Los Angeles has ruled that two former players from Pepperdine's women's basketball team can now sue the school based on sexual orientation discrimination. The ruling will allow Haley Videckis and Layana White, to proceed with a lawsuit against the university in Malibu, according to the L.A. Times. Their suit claims that they suffered harassment and discrimination at the school because they were dating. The two women say that the school's basketball coach wanted them off the school's basketball team because their lesbian relationship "would cause the team to lose games," according to the suit.
White and Videckis, who left Pepperdine last year, say that staff members from the women's basketball team questioned them about their sexual orientation, tried to access gynecological records, and wouldn't process White's NCAA appeal to play basketball in the 2014 season.
Pepperdine argued that "the alleged intrusion" into the women's personal matters were not true and that the coach's questions were aimed at improving team dynamics and to "end off-court distractions," according to court papers.
In his ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Dean Pregerson, contends that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation falls under the landmark Title IX law from 1972, which prohibits sex discrimination in the nation’s schools and colleges.
Support for LAist comes from
In an effort to dismiss parts of the lawsuit, filed earlier this year, Pepperdine argued that Title IX doesn't cover claims based on sexual orientation and that their allegations didn't meet the statute's standard for gender stereotype discrimination, according to City News Service. And while Pregerson initially sided with the school and dismissed the claims, he allowed the women to amend their lawsuit. He now says that they can pursue their lawsuit because their alleged mistreatment hinges on the nature of each individual's sex in the same-sex relationship.
"Plaintiffs allege that they were told that 'lesbianism' would not be tolerated on the team," Pregerson wrote in the ruling. "If plaintiffs had been males dating females, instead of females dating females, they would not have been subjected to the alleged different treatment," he said, saying that the two women have a "straightforward claim of sex discrimination."
Pregerson said in the ruling that he reversed his earlier decision because he was unable to distinguish between discrimination based on sexual orientation and that of sex and gender. "Simply put, the line between sex discrimination and sexual orientation discrimination is 'difficult to draw' because that line does not exist, save as a lingering and faulty judicial construct."
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs. -
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
Best of LAist