One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Officer Who Shot Unarmed Man Did Not Use Excessive Force, Jury Says
A line of police officers protect Anaheim City Hall during demonstrations to show outrage for the fatal shooting of Manuel Angel Diaz, 25, at Anaheim City Hall on July 24, 2012(Photo by Jonathan Gibby/Getty Images)
A federal grand jury ruled that a cop who gunned down an unarmed Anaheim man did not use excessive force, rejecting a $5 million wrongful death claim by the man's family.
The jury, who deliberated for only two hours, sided with Officer Nick Bennallack, who claimed that he "feared for his life" when he shot and killed 25-year-old Manuel Diaz, according to the O.C. Register. Bennallack was cleared of any criminal wrongdoing last year in Diaz's death.
Diaz was with friends in July of 2012 when Anaheim police officers showed up. When Diaz ran, Bennallack chased him around a corner, where Diaz turned around with his hands not visible to him. That's when Bennallack shot Diaz—once in the head and once in the buttocks, the O.C. Weekly reports. No gun was found on Diaz's body.
According to one juror, Bennalack had a reasonable suspicion that Diaz was armed because he "was dressed like a gang member," the Register reports. Another juror, after hearing Bennallack's claim that he feared for his life, said, "You have to look at the totality of everything, how things transpired, from beginning to end."
Diaz's family plans to appeal the ruling. “We’re going to keep fighting day by day,” Diaz's mother, Genevieve Huizar, said.
Their attorney, Dale Galipo, claims that the judge allowed evidence against Diaz that was not pertinent to the case, such as the fact that he had methamphetamine in his system and was a known gang member (which is something Diaz's family vehemently denies), according to City News Service. That evidence could have swayed the jurors' decision, Galipo says.
Diaz's death sent shockwaves throughout his community, with many residents decrying the officer's actions. Another Anaheim man, 22-year-old Joel Acevedo, was also killed by a cop the very next day, sparking violent protests against police in the city. That officer, Kelly Phillips was also cleared of criminal wrongdoing in Acevedo's death.
Related:
Video: Watch The Immediate Aftermath Of The Officer-Involved Shooting in Anaheim (Graphic)
Anaheim Cop Justified in Fatally Shooting Man in the Back, Says DA
Sponsored message
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
