With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
New bill would fine Congress members for trading stocks and owning blind trusts
Updated July 20, 2023 at 2:46 PM ET
Two U.S. senators plan to introduce bipartisan legislation to ban lawmakers, executive branch officials and their families from trading and owning stock in individual companies, which they say has strong support from Americans.
New York Democrat Kirsten Gillibrand, who is sponsoring the legislation along with Republican Sen. Josh Hawley, told Morning Edition on Thursday she's standing behind the proposed bill because lawmakers have access to information that the public does not. If used improperly, she says, that could give lawmakers and their families an unfair advantage in the stock market.
"From the American people's perspective, they want members of Congress to come to Washington to work for them," Gillibrand said. "And they don't expect members of Congress to make money off of their jobs, particularly through the stock trade."
The bill, Ban Stock Trading for Government Officials Act would bar stock trading and stock ownership — even in blind trusts — for members of Congress, the president, vice president, and senior executive branch officials, including their spouses and dependents.
A national poll by Morning Consult and Politico shows 68% of registered voters support banning stock trading for members of Congress. Another survey conducted by the University of Maryland's School of Public Policy found a broad 87% of bipartisan majorities favor prohibiting the president, vice president and the Supreme Court from trading stocks in individual companies, too.
This is one of several attempts in the Senate to ban or limit stock trading by Congress members.
The bill builds on the STOCK Act, a federal law that forbids members from trading non-public information received from their jobs. Although the act sought to create transparency, Gillibrand said several members violated the act and improperly reported their stock trades, and others found loopholes. From 2019 to 2021, there were 97 members, their spouses or dependents, who traded in companies affected by their committees.
"So if they're not breaking the law, they're certainly creating an appearance of impropriety," Gillibrand said.
Under Gillibrand and Hawley's bill, members of Congress would be charged at least 10% of the value of the prohibited investments, while employees of the executive branch would have to forfeit their stock profits and face fine of $10,0000 or more, whichever is greater.
"It's got teeth," Gillibrand said.
The bill would also require a public and searchable database of members' stock transactions. Similar to the STOCK Act, failure to file their personal financial transaction would result in a penalty up to $500.
This issue resurfaced in 2021 when seven member of the U.S. House of Representatives were accused of failing to file reports of stock trades in large companies like airlines, gold mining and AI companies.
Copyright 2023 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.
-
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places.
-
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.