One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Metro Proposes Big Fare Hikes
Photo by Mark Luethi via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr
Staring down a $36 million budget gap in 2016, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority is proposing fare hikes to cover the difference — a plan that would squeeze Southern California's legions of poor commuters.
One plan the agency released Friday would gradually raise fares from $1.50 to $2.25 a ride between now and 2021. Another option would institute rush hour price hikes that would reach as high as $3.25. There would also be big hikes for weekly passes under both plans — from $20 to $32 on the first, and to a whopping $45 on the second.
The organization warns that, without a change, it will be $225 million in debt by 2024.
Of course, price increases on Metro affect L.A. County's least affluent people — Southern California has seen a huge poverty increase in recent years — and advocates were quick to point out who loses when fares go up.
“The majority of MTA riders are poor and transit dependent," Barbara Lott-Holland, of the Transit Riders Union advocacy group, told the L.A. Times. "You’re asking the poorest of the poor to pay more."
Maybe Metro CEO Art Leahy — salary: $325,000 a year — should hop on the packed 720 bus at rush hour and take a survey of how many riders packed shoulder-to-shoulder on the way to their second job can pay an extra $25 a week. Hey, maybe they can even give him some ideas of ways to cut costs!
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
