This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Metro Board Approves June Bus Service Cuts
Photo by RobeRt Vega via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr
By a 7 to 6 vote this morning, Metro's Board of Directors approved the proposal to cut bus services, effective June 26th, reports The Source. The cuts will eliminate some lines and shorten others, with a goal of addressing cost efficiency and low ridership. Metro believes they will save $32 million annually thanks to the cuts, which will help the transit organization balance their budget.
Among those opposed to the cuts, and submitting a "no" vote, was Board Member and L.A. City Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who says he is not convinced these cuts will improve Metro's bus service efficiency. He was joined in opposition by Richard Katz, Mark Ridley-Thomas, Mel Wilson, Jose Huizar and Gloria Molina, notes the Source, with Pam O’Connor, Zev Yarolsavsky, Ara Najarian, Mike Antonovich, Don Knabe, Diane DuBois and John Fasana providing the seven "yes" votes.
Recently, Metro justified these bus service reductions by not only citing low ridership on certain lines, but pointing towards the increased use of rail, and the rail system's current expansion.
Some numbers:
- About 300,000 hours of service annually will be eliminated
- 212 Metro employees will be "reallocated" to "improve the cleanliness and maintenance of buses and to work on a real-time system to improve on-time performance."
- The lines that will be entirely discontinued are the 26, 247, 445, 634 and 757; other lines impacted include the 71, 94, 96, 155, 217, 230, 254, 450x, 485, 577, 751, 757, 760 and 794. (The Source has a linkto the .PDF of a report that details the specific line changes.)
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
