With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
The LA Lawyer Who Fought Prop 13 All The Way To The Supreme Court
Stephanie Nordlinger (Photo by Sean Havey for California Dream)
()
Stephanie Nordlinger was never a fan of Prop. 13. When it passed forty years ago, she feared that government services like parks and schools would suffer. Then, in 1988, she became a first-time homeowner.
She bought a modest home in Baldwin Hills for $170,000 -- about $370,000 in today's dollars. Nordlinger thought it was fundamentally wrong that she was paying more in property taxes than richer residents of the city, just because of when she bought.
After Nordlinger got her first property tax bill, she sued on the grounds that Prop. 13 violated the 14th amendment: equal protection under the law.
KPCC, in a state-wide media collaboration, has published a deep dive looking at whether it's fair that homeowners with similar house pay radically different taxes. And, yes, we tell you about what happened to Nordlinger's case as it made it all the way to the Supreme Court. READ OUR SPECIAL REPORT >>
Support for LAist comes from
Do you want to know more about Prop. 13 and how it changed the California Dream?
Of course you do.
- Mapping California's Prop. 13 winners and losers, down to your neighborhood
- What is Prop. 13? Your Prop. 13 cheatsheet
- Public schools, public trust: The profound effect of Prop. 13 on California's public schools
- Too few homes: Is Prop. 13 to blame for the state's housing shortage?
- Neighborhood in flux Prop. 13 promised to keep our neighborhoods stable. Did it work?
- Expanding Prop. 13: A proposition on November's ballot renews the Prop. 13 debate.
- Should businesses pay more? In 2020, voters could raise property tax bills for businesses
(Photo by Sean Havey / California Dream)
()
The California Dream series is a statewide media collaboration of CALmatters, KPBS, KPCC, KQED and Capital Public Radio with support from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and the James Irvine Foundation.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress. -
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent. -
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places. -
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures. -
It will be the second national day of protest against President Donald Trump. -
The university says the compact, as the Trump administration called it, could undermine free inquiry and academic excellence.
Best of LAist