Some Californians Would Be Left Out Of Trump's Plan To Extend Unemployment Benefits

Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily coronavirus newsletter. To support our nonprofit public service journalism: Donate now.

Over the weekend, President Trump issued an executive order that would partially replace the $600 in weekly federal unemployment benefits that expired last month.

But it's not clear the state will go along with Trump's plan. And even if it did, many Californians would not be eligible for the benefits.

NEWSOM SAYS CALIFORNIA CAN'T AFFORD TRUMP'S PLAN

Trump's order would provide unemployed workers $300 per week in federal benefits. States would have to chip in an additional $100 to bring the total to $400 per week on top of whatever people are already receiving in state benefits.

Governor Gavin Newsom said in a news conference on Monday that he'd hoped to see passage of the Congressional Democrats' plan to extend the $600 per week in federal benefits.

He said $400 per week is better than nothing -- but the federal government would need to front the full cost in order for California to participate. Otherwise, he estimated it would cost California $700 million per week to implement Trump's plan.

"The state does not have an identified resource of $700 million per week that we haven't already obliged," Newsom said. "There is no money sitting in the piggy bank."

Even if California were to enact Trump's plan, many freelancers and low-income workers in the state would be left out.

That's because the President's order requires unemployment recipients to receive "at least $100 per week" through existing state unemployment programs. Anyone earning less would not qualify for the extended federal benefits.

'I DON'T KNOW HOW I'M GOING TO SURVIVE'

Woodland Hills resident Judith Pomposo earns the vast majority of her income from running a small promotional products business, making things like t-shirts, business cards and uniforms for other companies.

But she's getting just $67 in state unemployment benefits because, like many self-employed workers, she also has a part-time job on the side working as a restaurant hostess. She earns W-2 employment wages through that job. And under state rules, that was the only source of income used to calculate her benefits.

"I can't live off of $67 a week," Pomposo said. "I'm a single parent, and I don't know how I'm going to survive."

Culver City freelance makeup artist Veronica Sinclair is in the same situation, earning just $77 per week based on a small number of makeup jobs that paid her as a W-2 employee.

She said her savings could last a few more months. But it doesn't look like her industry will recover anytime soon, and she doesn't know what other kind of work she'll be able to find.

"I feel completely unsure about how I'm going to pay my bills," Sinclair said. "I feel really frustrated. There are people that are just being left in the dust, and I'm one of those people."

WE ARE HERE TO HELP: HOW TO (NEW) LA

• A Step-By-Step Guide To Getting The Most Money Possible From Your Unemployment Benefits In California
• What's Open And What Are The Rules?
• Is It Safe Out There?
• What To Do If You Have It, Might Have It, Or Were Possibly Exposed To The Coronavirus
• An FBI Hostage Negotiator Tells Us How To Talk To People About Masks
• Need Some Mental Health Support? Start Here
• The 5 Most Important Things To Know About The Outside World