Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
LAist Guide to the Primary: Proposition 91
()
While the presidential election is the sexy supermodel on the Feb. 5 California Primary ballot, there are three important propositions asking you to say Yes or No when you walk in to that polling place or mail in your vote.
Winston Churchill once said, "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others." Therefore, in the spirit of voting, let us take some time to open your minds to the wonderful world of Proposition 91, known in some circles as Transportation Funds. Constitutional Amendment and Statute. Now if that don't sound like a soothing piece of jazz, then I don't want to know what does.
After the jump, learn what is says, what it will do, how it will change your life and why the people who wrote the law want you to not vote for it.
Support for LAist comes from
Proposition 91: Transportation Funds. Constitutional Amendment and Statute.
What it says:
- Prop. 91 prohibits certain gas taxes from cars and uses taxes that are set aside for the state Transportation Investment Fund from being kept in the General Fund, which is basically California's piggy bank.
- Prop. 91 requires repayment by June 2017 of such car gas taxes retained in General Fund from June 2003 to June 2008.
- In effect, 91 Changes how and when General Fund borrowing of certain transportation funds is allowed.
()
Current Law:
- The state already collects various taxes and fees on gasoline, driver licenses, truck weights and vehicle registrations. These taxes and fees are earmarked to pay for state and local transportation systems, such as roads, highways, streets and public transit. In some cases, the State Constitution allows these earmarked funds to be loaned for up to three years to the state’s General Fund and spent for other purposes besides transportation. In 2006, voters passed Proposition 1A that limits borrowing some of these transportation funds.
How would it change your life:
- As with 1A, you might see more construction projects on freeways and roads.
Financial impact on you, the tax payer:
- Prop. 91 would make state funding for highways, streets and roads more stable and predictable each year. However, it may also reduce the stability of certain local funds for public transit.
Who supports it:
- Basically no one. The people who wrote the original measure are now asking you to vote against it. Mark Watts, executive director of Transportation California and Jim Earp, executive director for the California Alliance for Jobs both pushed for this bill in 2006, just as 77% of voters adopted Prop. 1A, effectively nullifying the benefits of 91. "By passing Proposition 1A, voters solved the problem of state raids of our gas tax funds," they said. "Proposition 91 is no longer needed."
- There are no organized proponents of 91.
How much they've spent trying to tell you how to vote?
- The "Vote NO on 91" people have spent $64,821.81.
Flickr image of "VOTE" via d.rex; Flickr image of freeway construction by darryleasy
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars. -
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.
Best of LAist