Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

City Council Recommends Electric Rate Hikes

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

carbon-surcharge-modified.jpg
Photo by twicepix via Flickr


Photo by twicepix via Flickr
After an intensely heated debate at the L.A. City Council today, councilmembers approved a recommendation to modify Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's carbon surcharge plan, which in part would steer the Los Angeles Department of Power & Water to use more energy from renewables instead of coal. Under the recommendation, residents would pay 25% less than originally sought--around 4.5% and business 5% to 6%. The proposal now must be taken up by the Board of Water & Power Commission.

One of many people who stood up in support of the carbon surcharge astutely pointed out that "this rake hike is essential to educating people the value of energy in this city." While most everyone who spoke today agreed with the notion of going green, it was the the plan behind it.

"If you believe in cleaning our air and reducing our carbon footprint, that is not in this proposal," Councilman Greig Smith expressed with a raised voice, pointing out that the plan doesn't include reducing the use of coal. "We're just buying some other stuff."

Former LAPD Chief and Councilman Bernard Parks added that "this is the worst managed proposal... It's basically insulting our intelligence," he said of how the plan was presented last minute. The Council was warned that if the plan wasn't approved, the city would go bankrupt.

Considering the emergency nature of going bankrupt, Councilmember Paul Krekorian said the Board of Water & Power Commissioners had "outrageous arrogance" for not scheduling a meeting this week to take up the carbon surcharge plan.

Villaraigosa wants Los Angeles to be powered from 20% renewable by the end of the year and 40% by 2020. State law will dictates municipalities must hit certain emissions caps before 2012 or fines could be imposed.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today