Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

LADWP is 'Holding the City Taxpayers Hostage' Over Revenue Transfer

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

ladwp-revenue-transfer-request.jpg
Detail of LADWP's downtown headquarters | Photo by Huro Kitty via LAist Featured Photos on Flickr


Detail of LADWP's downtown headquarters | Photo by Huro Kitty via LAist Featured Photos on Flickr
Leaders of the Los Angeles City Council today requested that the head of the Department of Water and Power recommend fulfilling a budgeted money transfer, which would save the city from bankruptcy on May 5th. Citing $1 billion in reserves, a letter to David Freeman said there was no need to withhold a transfer of $73.5 million. Freeman said the utility doesn't have sufficient funds to warrant a transfer without jeopardizing its bond rating.

"With regard to the Department's bond ratings, it seems that the Department is holding the City taxpayers hostage in asserting that fulfilling our commitment to the city will assuredly result in a bond rating downgrade," said the letter, which was signed by Council President Eric Garcetti and Councilmembers Jan Perry, Dennis Zine and Bernard Parks.

The letter continued to lay out the Council's perspective on why they wouldn't approve a rate hike sought under the carbon surcharge plan, which would have raised rates up to 28% for customers. "The fact that an increase by April 1 was not achieved is not due to the unwillingness of the Council to support the Department, it was the result of the last-minute rate restructuring proposal that, as PA Consulting clearly stated, was very different from their recommendations, insufficient time for community stakeholders to voice their views on the proposed increases, and the unwillingness of the Board to accept the proposal presented to it by the Council."

The letter said the Board has the option to raise rates by .1-cents per kWh hour and also accept the council's recommendation of a lower rate hike, but hasn't chosen to do so. "It is inaccurate and irresponsible to lay at the feet of the Council... the blame for uncertainties in the financial markets about the future of the Department," the letter read.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today