Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
City of Los Angeles to Run Out of Money on May 5th, According to Projections

Photo by current events via LAist Featured Photos on Flickr
“The question I have been asked most often during the budget crisis is 'When will the City run out of money?' Unfortunately, we finally have the answer," announced City Controller Wendy Gruel this afternoon after the L.A. Department of Water & Power said it would not transfer $73 million to the city's General Fund, which pays for police and other basic city services. "Without the full Power Revenue Transfer I now project that if the City remains on its current path, the City’s General Fund will be out of money - in fact it will be negative $10 million - on May 5th, 2010."Ouch.
Greuel says balancing the budget is likely out of realm at this point and the city's reserve fund balance "could be anywhere from $0 to negative $43 million on June 30th." The consequence of that would leave the city with "no room to cover any additional shortfalls or unexpected emergencies.” (So if Mulholland Drive closes again, city emergency funds may not be around to fix it)
“This is the most urgent fiscal crisis that the City has faced in recent history, and it is imperative that you act now," Greuel said in a letter to the City Council and Mayor, asking for an immediate "transfer $90 million from the City’s Reserve Fund to the General Fund." If city employees cannot be paid, the city cannot "legally permit" them to work. "Unless you take action to transfer $90 million from the Reserve Fund, beginning April 19th, 2010, my office may not be able to pay the salaries of all City employees and/or make payments to vendors."
The $73 million in question stems from the recent carbon surcharge battle, which Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa touted as rake hike to bring Los Angeles more renewable power. Behind closed doors, but reported widely, the hike would also help save the LADWP's bond rating and budget.
Traditionally, the Board of Water and Power Commission, which oversees the LADWP, makes an annual $220 million transfer to the city's general budget. The DWP has already given about $143 million, but has withheld the remaining $73.5 million, enough to pay for 1,000 jobs. The carbon surcharge debate turned into a quid-pro-quo situation--if the Council would approve Villaraigosa's carbon surcharge plan, the Council would receive the remaining balance and avoid bankruptcy. After some back and forth, the council rejected the surcharge, which prompted today's news that the board struck back.
"This is not the first year in the Power System's history that the anticipated transfer has not been made," noted LADWP Interim General Manager David Freeman in a letter to Greuel. "While the financial plan for the Power System includes a transfer to the City each year, contraints on net income and finnacial challenges can reduce the amount of the transfer."
Freeman said that city law requires the utility to have a "declaration of surplus" in order to transfer the money. "No declaration of surplus can be made at this time," he added.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.