Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Registration starts Jan. 14
    A view of an outdoor cement skate park near a beach, with a giant white logo that says "LA28" on it.
    The 2028 Olympics will be played across Los Angeles and other parts of Southern California.

    Topline:

    Registration for tickets to the 2028 Olympic Games will open on Jan. 14, LA28 organizing committee officials announced today.

    How it works: Registering for the draw puts you in the running to buy Olympics tickets. If you're selected, you'll get an email with a time slot to purchase tickets.

    When will tickets actually go on sale? There are no firm dates yet, but LA28 says tickets for the Olympics are slated to go on sale in 2026 and Paralympics tickets will follow in 2027.

    How much will tickets cost? Details on ticket pricing aren't out yet. LA28 has said the least expensive tickets will be $28. If the World Cup is any indication, tickets could also get pretty pricey.

    Go deeper: The Olympics are a multi-billion dollar business. Here's what that means for LA taxpayers

  • Brier Oak received 3 'AA' citations since 2022
    A green sign atop a one-story building reads "BRIER OAK ON SUNSET"
    Brier Oak on Sunset nursing home in Hollywood has been cited three times in recent years for care violations that led to patient deaths.

    Topline:

    An East Hollywood nursing home that nearly lost its license this year because of repeated state citations for deaths of residents at the facility was cited again last month after another death.

    What happened? The California Department of Public Health cited Brier Oak on Sunset after a 92-year-old resident bled to death on Sept. 27. Staff members had continued injecting her with blood thinners over a 40-hour period despite evidence that the patient had been bleeding internally.

    Why it matters: It’s an AA citation, the most severe the department issues when violations of care standards are determined to be a substantial factor in someone’s death. These kinds of citations are rare. State regulations require authorities to suspend or revoke the licenses of any facilities that get two AA citations within a period of 24 months. Brier Oak has received three AA citations for patient deaths since late 2022.

    What's next? The state Public Health Department said Brier Oak submitted a required written response before a Dec. 6 deadline, showing how it will fix the problems and prevent them from happening again. Brier Oak has until Dec. 19 to notify the department whether it intends to appeal the state citation.

    An East Hollywood nursing home that nearly lost its license this year because of repeated state citations for deaths of residents at the facility was cited again last month after another person died.

    The California Department of Public Health cited Brier Oak on Sunset after a 92-year-old resident bled to death on Sept. 27. Staff members had continued injecting her with blood thinners over a 40-hour period in violation of clinical guidelines.

    It’s an AA citation, the most severe the department issues when violations of care standards are determined to be a substantial factor in someone’s death. The facility faces a $120,000 fine.

    These kinds of citations are rare. The department has recently issued, on average, fewer than 20 AA citations yearly across more than 1,200 skilled nursing facilities in California.

    Brier Oak has received three AA citations for patient deaths since late 2022.

    State regulations require authorities to suspend or revoke the licenses of any facilities that get two AA citations within a period of 24 months.

    The state Public Health Department began that process with Brier Oak in May based on resident deaths in 2022 and 2024. But officials dropped that effort later because they say they determined the two patient deaths had occurred 26 months apart — just outside of the two-year window.

    A spokesperson for the company that owns Brier Oak told LAist it has appealed the first two citations and is considering whether to appeal the third.

    Advocates for nursing home residents say the recent death could have been avoided if the state had taken action.

    “There were red flags, and a lot of these red flags existed prior to the death of this poor resident,” said Tony Chicotel, senior staff attorney with  California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform.

    The state said Brier Oak has until Dec. 19 to notify the department if it intends to appeal.

    What led to the patient deaths?

    In the recent death at Brier Oak cited by the state, multiple communication and technical failures by nursing staff led to the patient bleeding out over a period of 40 hours, according to the citation.

    The 92-year-old patient was immobile and had been prescribed a blood thinner called heparin to help prevent blood clots from forming. But once a patient is bleeding, those injections make bleeding worse, and potentially fatal.

    When nursing staff found bright red blood in the resident’s diaper the day before she died, Brier Oak failed to follow established processes for documenting the bleeding or communicating it to a nurse practitioner or medical doctor, according to the citation.

    Nurses told state authorities they delayed informing physicians because they “get mad” when contacted in the middle of the night.

    The facility’s staff also failed to fully assess the patient to determine the possible causes of the bleeding and or to properly monitor the issue during crucial periods, according to the citation.

    She suffered four internal bleeding episodes over 40 hours and continued to receive blood thinner injections.

    The citation says a nurse practitioner at Brier Oak told state licensing authorities later that if she’d been informed about the patient’s ongoing bleeding, she would have stopped the blood thinner and sent her to a hospital.

    In 2022, Brier Oak received a AA citation after a 62-year-old woman died from respiratory failure in part because nurses hadn’t been trained to operate her breathing machine.

    In 2024, the nursing home got another AA citation. This time, a 63-year-old woman with paraplegia and severe obesity fell from her bed and died while a nursing assistant was changing her. The assistant was alone, even though the woman’s care plan required two staff members.

    Who owns Brier Oak?

    Brier Oak on Sunset is primarily owned by Genesis Healthcare, a publicly-traded nursing home operator that filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in July.

    Once the largest nursing home operator in the U.S., Genesis was facing billions in debt when it declared bankruptcy, according to court filings. That includes millions in potential damages from lawsuits related to patient care failures.

    In a brief statement to LAist, a company spokesperson said it's still considering whether or not to appeal the recent citation at Brier Oak.

    The citation should trigger a suspension or revocation of the facility's license, according to state regulations. The latter means it would have to close its doors. The two most recent deaths and citations at the facility occurred within the two-year window.

    The California Department of Public Health confirmed it cited Brier Oak on Nov. 26.

    The department said the facility submitted a required written response before a Dec. 6 deadline, showing how it will fix the problems and prevent them from happening again..

    The department determined Brier Oak was back in compliance during an onsite visit last week, a representative told LAist.

    Brier Oak on Sunset currently houses about 150 patients, according to state records.

    A bankruptcy judge has stalled the proposed sale of Genesis Healthcare to an affiliate of one of its investors.

    Experts say it’s unclear whether the state would revoke the license of an owner who is actively trying to sell and turn over operations to someone else.

  • Sponsored message
  • It's been a slow start for SoCal ski resorts
    A snowboarder catches air atop a freshly groomed snow, as others look on from the chair lifts. The skies are slighly overcast. In the background, there are large swaths of land that are free of snow, underscoring the dry, warm conditions.
    There's snow beneath the chair lifts but the backdrop at Big Bear Mountain Resort shows just how warm and dry conditions have been.

    Topline

    It’s been a rough start to ski and snowboard season for California mountain towns. Snowfall is well below average, but Christmas could come with some of the white stuff.

    Hmmm. Didn’t we just have a record storm? Yes. That big atmospheric river that hit Southern California last month made it one of the wettest Novembers on records. But since then, it’s been unusually warm and dry, which is not good for mountain towns that depend on snow, and the outdoor enthusiasts that flock to them.

    Read on ... for more about the conditions at Big Bear Mountain resort, and whether we'll have more snow in time for Christmas vacations.

    It’s been a rough start to ski and snowboard season for California mountain towns. Snowfall is well below average, but Christmas could come with some of the white stuff. Here's where things stand:

    Hmmm. Didn’t we just have a record storm?

    Yes. That big atmospheric river that hit Southern California last month made it one of the wettest Novembers on records. But since then, it’s been unusually warm and dry, which is not good for mountain towns that depend on snow, and the outdoor enthusiasts that flock to them.

    How bad is it?

    California’s snowpack is about 20% of normal for this time of the year, according to the state’s snow-tracking website. Southern California isn’t quite as bad off — we’ve gotten about half our normal snowfall so far.

    As for the resorts, only about 20% of the terrain at Bear Mountain in Big Bear is open. About 35% of Mammoth Mountain is open.

    Can’t they just make snow?

    They are, but the unusually warm temperatures have curbed resorts’ ability to make enough snow to open more terrain. “If you're blowing water into 40-degrees, it's going to stay water,” said Justin Kanton, a spokesperson for Big Bear Mountain Resort. “ So as much as people probably would want us to just crank the snow guns all day, every day up here and just get things moving, that's not really possible.”

    But there’s a silver lining!

    The dry weather has allowed Caltrans to make good progress toward opening Highway 38, said Evan Engle, who chairs the board of the Big Bear Chamber of Commerce. The road typically handles up to 40% of traffic up to the mountain town, Engle said. But it’s been closed since September when it got washed out by Tropical Storm Mario.

    Getting it open as soon as possible is key to keeping visitor traffic manageable, and getting supplies to Big Bear.

    What’s the snow outlook?

    SoCal mountains are likely to see some precipitation around Christmas, said Kyle Wheeler, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service. But with temperatures not expected to drop much, it’s uncertain how much of it will be white, Wheeler said.

    If you go to Big Bear: 

    • If you plan to hit the slopes, get on it early, when the snow is at its best given the warm conditions. 
    • No snow? There’s more to do than ski and snowboard. Check this list of winter fun events.  
    • Worried about traffic? Consider going up earlier in the week. If you can’t do that, consider taking Highway 18 through Lucerne Valley. It’s a longer route if you’re coming from L.A., but less traveled, and less likely to make you car sick (fewer tight curves). 

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is @jillrep.79.

    • For instructions on getting started with Signal, see the app's support page. Once you're on, you can type my username in the search bar after starting a new chat.
    • And if you're comfortable just reaching out by email I'm at jreplogle@scpr.org

  • 2,466 munitions used in June, reports say
    A man in tactical gear shoots a cannister off frame. Another man in tactical gear is mounted on a horse.
    The LAPD deployed less-lethal munitions and mounted units on June 14.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles Police Department used 2,431 less-lethal projectile rounds and 35 canisters of tear gas from June 6 through 14, according to newly released documents. The department reported causing 12 injuries with those weapons.

    Why now? The LAPD released a new document last week after LAist found the department did not publish state-mandated reports for four days when officers used crowd control weapons over that period. The department said on Dec. 10 the delay “stems from the extraordinary volume and complexity of incidents” over that time.

    This report is different: Unlike most of the LAPD’s reports after using crowd control weapons, this one covers multiple days and protests. The report includes the first “No Kings” protest on June 14, but lacks detailed descriptions of specific dates or incidents.

    Read on… for more about the newly-released report.

    The Los Angeles Police Department used more than 2,400 crowd control munitions in response to protests from June 6 to 14, according to a new report.

    Officers used a total of 2,431 less-lethal projectile rounds and 35 canisters of tear gas over the nine days, according to LAPD reports. The department recorded 12 injuries officers caused with those weapons.

    The LAPD released the missing report last week after LAist identified the use of crowd control weapons on four different days in June that had not been reported according to state law. Assembly Bill 48, which went into effect in 2022, limits when and how crowd control weapons can be used, and requires law enforcement agencies to publicly release reports on their use within 60 days.

    A 30-day extension for these reports can be granted in some cases, but the LAPD released this report about three months late even if an extension was justified.

    Officials acknowledged they were out of compliance on Dec. 10 before releasing the report, saying the delay “stems from the extraordinary volume and complexity of incidents” over that time.

    This report is different from others

    It is unusual for a crowd control report to include more than one day, and the report for June 9 through 14 covered six days and “45 sepearte [sic] non categorical use of force incidents.”

    It does not describe any of those use of force incidents specifically, and the LAPD has not yet responded to LAist’s request for more detailed descriptions of those incidents.

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is  jrynning.56.

    The report also considered the entire six days to have been one continuous protest, though it included several anti-ICE protests over the week and the national “No Kings” protest on June 14.

    Two reports released earlier this year for June 6 and 8 covered single days and provided more detailed descriptions of incidents where the LAPD used less-lethal munitions against protesters.

  • Study shows indoor UV light leads to higher risk
    A person laying down in a tanning bed that is on, giving a blue light.
    People who regularly use tanning beds are more likely to have DNA damage that can lead to melanoma across nearly the entire surface of their skin.

    Topline:

    A resurgence of indoor tanning among young people is an alarming trend, says Seattle dermatologist Heather Rogers, that comes after years of decline of the practice in the U.S.

    Why it matters: In a new study in the journal Science Advances, researchers found that tanning bed users were nearly three times as likely to develop melanoma — the deadliest form of skin cancer — compared to people who'd never tanned indoors. They also had DNA damage that can lead to melanoma across nearly the entire surface of the skin.

    Read on ... for more worrying findings from the study.

    Hop onto TikTok and you'll find lots of videos of young people — mostly women — fake baking under the glowing UV lights of a tanning bed. Seattle dermatologist Heather Rogers says this is an alarming trend that comes after years of decline in indoor tanning in the U.S.

    She points to a 2025 survey from the American Academy of Dermatology which found 20% of Gen Z respondents prioritize getting a tan over protecting their skin. And 25% say it's worth looking great now even if it means looking worse later.

    They feel like "it's better to be tan than it is to worry about skin cancer," Rogers says.

    A new study in the journal Science Advances reinforces just why they should worry.

    Researchers found that tanning bed users were nearly three times as likely to develop melanoma — the deadliest form of skin cancer — compared to people who'd never tanned indoors. They also had DNA damage that can lead to melanoma across nearly the entire surface of the skin.

    "Even in skin cells that look normal, in tanning bed patients, you can find those precursor mutations" that lead to melanoma, says Dr. Pedram Gerami, one of the study's authors and the IDP Foundation professor of skin cancer research at Northwestern University.

    Gerami and his collaborators compared the medical records of nearly 3,000 patients who used tanning beds to an age-matched control group of patients who didn't tan indoors. They found that the more people used the tanning beds, the higher their risk of melanoma.

    "If they had 10 to 50 tanning bed exposures, their risk was twice as high as the control group," Gerami says. If they had over 200 tanning bed visits, their risk was more than eight times as high.

    "If you think about it, getting 200 tanning bed exposures can happen really quickly. If you go once a week for four years, there you are," he says.

    The researchers also performed genetic sequencing on normal skin cells from tanning bed users. Most were younger women, which makes sense, because studies have shown that young women in their teens and 20s are the heaviest users of indoor tanning, says study co-author Hunter Shain, an associate professor of dermatology at the UC San Francisco.

    Shain says when the researchers compared these skin samples to normal skin cells from people in the general population who were twice the age of the indoor tanners, they were "stunned" by what they found.

    "Women in their 30s and 40s had more mutations than people in their 70s and 80s from the general population," says Shain, whose research focuses on the biology of skin cancer. "They somehow were able to cram in two lifetimes' worth of UV damage in 30 years."

    Dr. Heather Rogers, who was not involved in the study, notes that tanning beds can emit ultraviolet radiation that is 10 to 15 times stronger than what you'd get from the sun. She says that tanning beds are often marketed as being safer than the sun, but this study shows how wrong those claims are.

    Dr. Pedram Gerami says many of the patients he sees at a high-risk melanoma clinic are women who started indoor tanning as teens wanting to look better for events like homecoming and prom.

    "Now, as young adults, they're having to deal with frequent skin checks, frequent doctor visits, frequent biopsies, lots of anxiety, and the emotional burden of having been diagnosed with cancer at a young age," Garami says. "So they have a lot of heaviness to deal with."

    He says some of these patients chose to donate skin samples to the study in hopes of helping other young people avoid the same fate.

    Copyright 2025 NPR