Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Los Angeles Is 87 Percent Urban, According To Angelenos

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.


A recent survey shows that Los Angeles may be, despite its reputation, surprisingly urban—at least in terms of how the people who live here describe it. Those of us who call downtown or Koreatown home may have already felt like we live in a very urban area, but for many—mostly outsiders—Los Angeles conjures an image of sprawl. The U.S. Census basically clumps urban and suburban together—regardless of whether someone lives in a huge mixed-user next to a subway station with ground floor retail, or in a single-family home in a subdivision. Jed Kolko, chief economist at Trulia, decided to try to find a better way to more clearly define urban and suburban areas, according to FiveThirtyEight.

Kolko and Trulia surveyed 2,008 people across the country. Each was asked to describe whether their neighborhood was urban, rural or suburban. They did not give residents any kind of description of what these terms meant, and used the residents' ZIP codes as their neighborhoods. Based on these responses, they then mapped out the areas. Los Angeles came out as 87 percent urban. You can compare that to NYC and Chicago—both 100 percent urban—or San Diego (49 percent) or Phoenix (30 percent).

Granted, a person's perception of where they live isn't always a great indicator of what that place is, and the distinction between urban and suburban largely varies based on a person's lived experiences. A New Yorker and someone from a smaller Midwestern city might feel very different about what constitutes as a city, or what seems bustling or sprawling.

It seems as though people in this particular survey were inclined to say they lived in an urban neighborhood if they lived in a dense area, or one with over 2,213 households per square mile. If residents lived in areas with 102 households or fewer per square mile, they often described their neighborhood as rural. If that number was somewhere in between, respondents were likely to define their home as suburban. The survey also found that people were more inclined to say they lived in urban areas if they were near other dense ZIP codes, lived in low-income areas or lived near a lot of businesses.

[h/t Curbed LA]

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today