This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
LA Goes Open Source?
It sounds like our fair city could be following in the footsteps of Brazil and turning to the low-cost alternative of an open source infrastructure. For those not involved in the on-going battles between proprietary and open source software, 'open source' encompasses any software which does not protect its source code from view, use or change by persons who do not own the software. According to the Open Source Initiative, "The basic idea behind open source is very simple: When programmers can read, redistribute, and modify the source code for a piece of software, the software evolves. People improve it, people adapt it, people fix bugs."
Per a press release dated today, February 2nd, Councilmembers Garcetti, Greuel and Weiss have introduced a motion that could save the city as much as $5.8 million dollars that is currently being spent on licenses for proprietary software. The City already utilizes some open source applications, including Linux and OpenOffice.org, but the change would result in a wider shift toward non-proprietary software. The motion also recommends that any funds saved through this move would be routed into the Special Fund for Efficiency Projects and Police Hiring—an clever move, especially considering recent debate over the half-cent sales tax hike.
All in all, LAist sees this as a smart and forward-thinking move. However, considering the history of bureaucracy and the omnipresent mire of red tape, we wonder just how many ways this good idea could go wrong...
Image from the Linux Kernel Archives
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
