Support for LAist comes from
We Explain L.A.
Stay Connected

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

L.A. Doctor Accused of Sexually Abusing Patients Waits for Jury's Decision

stethoscope365.jpg
Photo by jasleen_kaur via Flickr
Before you read more...
Dear reader, we're asking you to help us keep local news available for all. Your tax-deductible financial support keeps our stories free to read, instead of hidden behind paywalls. We believe when reliable local reporting is widely available, the entire community benefits. Thank you for investing in your neighborhood.

An L.A. doctor is awaiting his fate after jurors heard allegations that he sexually assaulted 11 female patients, reports the Royal Gazette. Kevin Brown, 40, is accused of everything from inappropriate breast and pelvic exams to forcible rape at clinics that he owned in L.A. Brown's case has drawn international interest, not just because of the nature of the alleged crimes but because his father, Ewart Brown, is the former premier of Bermuda.

One of Brown's alleged victims was an undercover LAPD officer.

According to the Royal Gazette, the prosecutor in Brown's case noted during the trial that it wasn't the first time the doctor had been accused of sexual assault -- he was acquitted of similar charges in 2004 and 2006, she said.

Brown's defense, Edi Faal, reportedly told the jury that the claims were implausible because the women didn't come forward and report them to Brown's staff right away. He also came out with this doozy:

Support for LAist comes from
Mr Faal said during his closing speech that the alleged victims who came forward lacked credibility, and represented a small fraction of the accused doctor’s total appointments. “That is a statistically insignificant amount,” said Mr Faal.