Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Proposition 46: Voter support drops when they hear the details, poll says

MIAMI, FL - JUNE 02:  A doctor wears a stethoscope as he see a patient for a measles vaccination during a visit to the Miami Children's Hospital on June 02, 2014 in Miami, Florida. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last week announced that in the United States they are seeing the most measles cases in 20 years as they warned clinicians, parents and others to watch for and get vaccinated against the potentially deadly virus.  (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
Proposition 46 increases the cap on medical malpractice suits and requires doctors to receive drug and alcohol testing.
(
Joe Raedle/Getty Images
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Voters support California's Proposition 46 by wide margins — until they hear the details of the initiative, particularly the fiscal impact, according to a new USC/Los Angeles Times poll.

The proposition increases the cap on medical malpractice suits, as well as requiring doctors to receive drug and alcohol testing.

In the poll, 62 percent of voters supported Prop 46 after being read the language on the ballot with 28 percent opposed, according to a press release from USC. However, support declines to 39 percent in favor and 50 percent opposed after hearing arguments from both sides.

Proponents say the proposition would ensure patient safety and hold doctors accountable, as well as allowing lawyers to take on important malpractice cases, according to the release. However, opponents counter that it would drive up state and local government costs by hundreds of millions of dollars a year, raising insurance rates, as well as increasing bureaucracy and keeping doctors from providing care. It would also create a database of patients' personal medical prescription information, created and run by the government.

"The initiative sponsors were very smart," USC's Dan Schnur said in the statement. "But a ballot initiative is only as strong as its weakest link, and the polling shows that voters’ concerns about medical malpractice are outweighing their eagerness for doctors to be drug tested."

On the specific points, 70 percent of voters were in favor of drug and alcohol testing for doctors, as well as requiring the California Medical Board to suspend doctors with positive tests, according to the release — 24 percent of voters were opposed. Voters split on increasing the medical malpractice cap from $250,000 to $1 million though, with 43 percent in favor and 46 percent opposed.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today