One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.
Proposed 'Six Californias' ballot measure fails to qualify for 2016 ballot
An image from the Six Californias website shows the proposed borders of its plan to slice the state into areas that the plan's backers say would be more manageable.
(
Six Californias
)
The proposed ballot measure that would have divided California into six different states has failed to qualify for the November 2016 ballot, the Sacramento Bee reports, not receiving enough valid signatures to make the grade.
The campaign turned in 1.14 million signatures in July, but random sampling finished Friday ruled that only 752,685 of the signatures were valid, the Bee reports, putting the measure about 15,000 signatures below what's needed to trigger a full count and qualify for the ballot.
The plan would have divided California into Jefferson in the northernmost portion, Northern California below that, Silicon Valley, Central California, West California and finally Southern California. The initiative was backed by tech industry investor Timothy Draper, and would have required the approval of California's Legislature and the U.S. Congress.
Draper had argued that dividing the state up would have made areas that were more governable, telling Marketplace that California was "a failed state."
If you want to find out which of the six states would have fit you best, take our quiz asking which one you should live in:
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
