This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.
Proposed 'Six Californias' ballot measure fails to qualify for 2016 ballot
An image from the Six Californias website shows the proposed borders of its plan to slice the state into areas that the plan's backers say would be more manageable.
(
Six Californias
)
The proposed ballot measure that would have divided California into six different states has failed to qualify for the November 2016 ballot, the Sacramento Bee reports, not receiving enough valid signatures to make the grade.
The campaign turned in 1.14 million signatures in July, but random sampling finished Friday ruled that only 752,685 of the signatures were valid, the Bee reports, putting the measure about 15,000 signatures below what's needed to trigger a full count and qualify for the ballot.
The plan would have divided California into Jefferson in the northernmost portion, Northern California below that, Silicon Valley, Central California, West California and finally Southern California. The initiative was backed by tech industry investor Timothy Draper, and would have required the approval of California's Legislature and the U.S. Congress.
Draper had argued that dividing the state up would have made areas that were more governable, telling Marketplace that California was "a failed state."
If you want to find out which of the six states would have fit you best, take our quiz asking which one you should live in:
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
