With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
Palm Springs will draft competing vacation rental initiative
Palm Springs voters could consider two competing measures about vacation rentals in an upcoming election.
A coalition of council members and public safety officials announced Wednesday they are requesting city staff draft a ballot measure that would require vacation rentals to comply with similar rules to the ones small hotels and motels in Palm Springs follow. Palm Springs city council members Geoff Kors and J.R. Roberts, along with Police Chief Brian Reyes and Fire Chief Kevin Nalder, all cited public safety in a statement the city released following the press conference.
Back in November, the Palm Springs City Council approved an ordinance that set more restrictions on vacation rentals within the city. According to that ordinance, residents are limited to owning one vacation rental property, renting it out a maximum of 32 times per year and they must pay higher amounts for permits (from $234 annually to $900) as well as fines for ordinance violations.
"What we're trying to avoid is people buying up neighborhoods for freestanding hotel room investments," Roberts told KPCC after the ordinance passed. "And that's where we were headed, and that's how we got into trouble, is it became very profitable for people to buy a house, or buy a number of houses, and simply use them as freestanding hotel rooms."
Both this new measure and another ordinance put forth by a group called Citizens for a Better Palm Springs challenge the ordinance the Palm Springs City Council passed in November. The Citizens for a Better Palm Springs measure seeks to alleviate restrictions on vacation rental properties and put the current ordinance up to voters.
The city-backed initiative would need to be approved by the full city council for it to appear on a ballot, while the initiative from Citizens for a Better Palm Springs needs to collect 2,600 signatures from eligible voters.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
-
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol.
-
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails.
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.