Support for LAist comes from
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Stay Connected
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Listen

Share This

KPCC Archive

Lawsuit says Navy sonar puts marine animals at risk

A rare and endangered blue whale, one of at least four feeding 11 miles off Long Beach Harbor in the Catalina Channel, rises to the surface on July 16, 2008 near Long Beach, California. In decades past, blue whales were rarely seen anywhere along California's coastline but their migration and feeding patterns are changing. The U.S. Navy's use of loud sonar blasts in submarine detection training exercises off Southern California has been blamed for being behind the unusual migration patterns.
A lawsuit against the Navy alleges sonar and explosives testing can harm blue whales, like the one pictured above.
(
David McNew/Getty Images
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive. 

Environmental groups led by the Natural Resources Defense Council filed a lawsuit on Monday morning against the Navy and the National Marine Fisheries Service over a permit allowing the Navy  to increase use of sonar and explosives in training activities off the coasts of Hawaii and Southern California.

The National Marine Fisheries Service, which is responsible for managing and protecting marine resources, approved the Navy’s request in December. The permit will be good for the next five years.

The Marine Mammal Protection Act makes it illegal to kill or harass marine mammals, but the government, including the Navy, may be granted exemptions in certain instances. The NRDC’s filing states that the Navy’s training exercises will have, “unprecedented impacts on marine mammals: 155 deaths, more than 2,000 permanent injuries, and nearly 9.6 million instances of temporary hearing loss and significant disruptions of vital behaviors.”

An NRDC official said that the National Marine Fisheries Service inadequately addressed the impact that the Navy’s request would have on marine life.

Support for LAist comes from

“The increase in the amount of harm that they’ve projected this time around is just huge,” said Zak Smith, an attorney with NRDC. “The agency charged with protecting [marine mammals] is just rolling over.”

The authorization mandates that the Navy follow several measures designed to minimize harmful effects on wildlife, including shutting down sonar and stopping detonations when marine mammals are seen within "mitigation zones" around vessels.

In a press release, the NRDC said that it also wants the Navy to institute additional safety practices, including avoiding exercises in habitats for endangered species and prohibiting testing at night, when it’s more difficult to detect marine mammals.

“This is the most powerful navy on the planet, [with] a rich history of doing incredible things. And you’re telling me that you can’t figure out a way to effectively train and protect marine mammals,” Smith said. “That’s ridiculous.”

Smith said that he hopes a decision from the U.S. District Court in San Francisco will come by fall. This is the 10th time that the NRDC has sued the Navy for its use of sonar or explosives in training and testing exercises.

A spokesman for the Navy said the military branch had not seen the most recent case filing. He said that while the Navy is committed to protecting marine life, it is also dedicated to national security.

“If the Navy cannot realistically train at sea and test our equipment, sailors' lives and our ability to defend against serious threats will be at risk,” The Navy's Kenneth Hess said. 

Support for LAist comes from

A spokeswoman for the National Marine Fisheries Service said the agency doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation. 

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist