Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Landowners spurn tax breaks to convert vacant lots to urban farms

A state law to give tax breaks to landowners who convert vacant lots to small urban farms has gone largely unused in the four years since it was passed. But now Long Beach, the latest city to offer the tax breaks, is adding a stick to the carrot of incentives.
Starting this month, Long Beach landowners who don’t convert their vacant parcels to small urban farms or community gardens will be billed a monthly fee to pay for city code enforcement officers to monitor the lots so they don’t turn into illegal dumping grounds or havens for crime.
The city will be charging owners a $53 dollar monthly fee to cover oversight of some 618 vacant lots, said Larry Rich, manager of Long Beach’s office of sustainability says.
“People will end up having to pay an additional fee to the city to have a vacant lot,” Rich said. They can avoid that fee if they do urban agriculture there instead.”
California’s largest cities and counties -- including Los Angeles County and the cities of Los Angeles, San Francisco, Sacramento, San Diego and San Jose -- all passed ordinances to offer the tax breaks enabled by AB 551, which became law in 2013.
Parcels up to 3 acres on land zoned for industrial, commercial or multi-family residential use can get their property tax assessments dropped to the lower agricultural valuation in exchange for a commitment to convert to organic farming of produce or animal husbandry for five years. (Marijuana cultivation not included.)
In the four years since the law passed, owners of only four vacant properties have entered agreements to convert the land to small farms, said Eli Zigas, statewide food and agriculture director of SPUR, a nonprofit that advocates for more urban farming. He published a report on participation in February.
Since then, a few more parcels have applied for the tax breaks. In Los Angeles city, five proposals for urban farms are under review and awaiting approval. There are none so far in unincorporated Los Angeles County, however, the county’s adoption of the state law clears the way for cities within L.A. County to offer the incentive.
Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones are intended to create more green space, jobs and locally-grown food. Vacant lots that become community gardens and small farms are considered less of a magnet for illegal dumping and crime.
But there are several barriers to converting vacant lots to urban infill farms, said Tony Damico, co-director of Long Beach Fresh, a nonprofit that is working to line up farmers to propose working one parcel in the city.
One barrier to property owners taking the deal is that, for many, their property taxes are already very low because they have owned the land for so long, the savings would not be significant. Landowners also might not know about the incentive, or they might not have a means of connecting with a farmer interested in leasing the land, Damico said.
Some of the objections that neighborhoods are likely to raise in response to the prospect of a vacant lot becoming a community garden or farm – like a load of chicken or steer manure being dumped near a neighbor’s window – have already been worked out in recent years as Long Beach has grown its list of community gardens to 16 sites.
“It’s been fine," Rich said. "We don’t anticipate a lot of those issues.” The city has also worked out rules regarding livestock like goats, chickens and bees, setting per-parcel limits that would apply to any newly created urban farms, he said.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.