With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
LA Sheriff's Department sends cease and desist over Yes On S 'eviction notice' mailer
The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department issued a cease and desist letter Friday over a Yes On S political campaign mailer designed to look like a Sheriff's Department eviction notice, according to a statement from the department.
"The political mailer depicted in the photos attached to this message is counterfeit and could mislead members of the public to believe they are subject to legal action by the Sheriff’s Department," the department said in the statement. "The use of this mailer is unauthorized and unlawful under the California Business and Professions Code."
The mailer, paid for by the Coalition to Preserve L.A., looks like an eviction notice, with the case number replaced by "THIS COULD BE YOU OR A LOVED ONE." It also includes a fine-print disclaimer required of political mailers as well as a mass mailing postage stamp in the corner. On the opposite side, the mailer reads, "For 20,000 Angelenos, this notice was real because of greedy developers," before continuing to make a pitch for Measure S.
The Sheriff's Department cites a code that prohibits using "a trade or brand name, seal, emblem, or insignia" without permission in a way that indicates something has been approved or endorsed by the local government.
Coalition to Preserve LA, who authored and sent the mailers, defended the mailer pointing out that a campaign disclaimer was included.
"We did not mean to scare anyone," said a spokesperson on Saturday. "We sent mailer to highlight evictions, which are happening around the city, particularly in low income areas, where developers are building more and more luxury developments."
The letter from the Sheriff's Department asked Preserve LA to mail a correction stating that it did not authorize the mailer.
Preserve LA said its attorneys were reviewing the letter and determining if they would comply with its requests.
Read the full cease and desist letter from the Sheriff's Department below:
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
-
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol.
-
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails.
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.