Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Finding the right 'recipe' for a preschool ratings system in transition

A new report finds California is failing it's low income four-year-olds in the state preschool program.
A new report finds California is failing it's low income four-year-olds in the state preschool program.
(
Photo by Corie Howell via Flickr Creative Commons
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 0:50
Finding the right 'recipe' for a preschool ratings system in transition

As California’s rating system for preschools transitions from federal funding to state and county support, educators are reflecting on what has worked and what might still need to be fine-tuned.

In 2012 and 2013, the state received $75 million in grant money from the Obama administration’s "Race to the Top" initiative to build a rating system for childcare and preschool programs.

That funding ran out last June, and now the architects of the rating system are receiving funding from two state sources. 

Under the so-called Quality Rating and Improvement System, programs are rated according to seven measures: qualifications of the lead teacher, qualifications of the director, physical environment of space, effective teacher-child interactions, children’s access to annual screenings for vision and hearing, evidence of child assessments for development, and teacher-to-child ratios. Scores range from 2 to 5.

As of 2015, 82 early education sites in Los Angeles County had been rated. Fifty-three of these sites received a rating of 2, 18 sites received a score of 3, and 11 sites received a rating of 4.

Since then, Dawn Kurtz, chief program officer at Los Angeles Universal Preschool, says that her organization has been providing classroom and assessment materials, trainings, and other support to help improve quality.

"There’s discussions about potential changes [to the rating system] some point down the line," Kurtz said. "But we need to wait long enough to make sure that we’re not making any changes that would impact our ability to make comparisons over time."

Sponsored message

At a minimum, they need two years. Then Quality Start L.A., the group overseeing the implementation of the rating system in L.A. County, may tinker with the formula it's using, but Kurtz said they have the main elements down.

"There’s still a lot of healthy conversation about is what is the right recipe," Kurtz said. "But I don’t think there’s some secret element out there that we haven’t identified yet. It’s more about the mix."

Eventually, these ratings—and the way they change over time—will be consolidated and available online.

The state is also trying to consolidate some of the data that goes into the rating system into one place, the California Early Care and Education Workforce Registry.

"The goal for California is to have a robust early care and education professional development system where folks can have one place that houses all their qualifications that links to permits, training and the [rating system]," said Fiona Stewart, program director for the Child Care Alliance of Los Angeles. "It’s sort of like a robust Linked-In for childcare providers."

Going forward, when infant and toddler programs and preschools that receive state funding in L.A. County want to participate in the rating system, signing up with the registry will be required.

Then, all of the data collected on this site—including the qualifications of teachers or directors, which are two factors in the seven-factor rating matrix—will be available and easily accessible for those tasked with assigning site ratings.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right