Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Jury Awards $417 Million In Lawsuit Against Johnson & Johnson Over Alleged Link Between Ovarian Cancer And Talcum Products
A Los Angeles jury awarded a record $417 million to a 63-year-old woman who sued Johnson & Johnson after she developed terminal ovarian cancer, alleging the cancer stemmed from using the company's iconic baby powder for feminine hygiene. The lawsuit is one of a number around the country that allege the company refused to acknowledge studies linking their talcum products to ovarian cancer. The $417 million award is the largest payment yet, according to the L.A. Times.
The plaintiff, California woman Eva Echeverria, used the product from age 11 until 2016, when she was in her 60s. She testified that she stopped using the product after seeing a news story where another woman with ovarian cancer admitted to using the product. Echeverria was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2007, according to the Chicago Tribune. Her cancer has become terminal and she was unable to appear in person to testify.
The 2016 case stemmed from the death of Alabama woman Jacqueline Fox, who died of ovarian cancer. Four months after her death, a St. Louis jury awarded $72 million in damages and concluded Johnson & Johnson was negligible and conspired to ignore the potential cancerous risk from using its baby powder, according to Bloomberg. After her case, over 1,000 lawsuits have been filed around the country from women alleging a connection between ovarian cancer and the baby powder.
Fox, Echeverria, and other women who have filed suits all used baby powder in their underwear for feminine hygiene purposes. The powder has shown no ill health effects from general use, but some studies have shown a connection between cancer and genital use. Other studies have shown minimal connection, however, so the American Cancer Society considers the findings mixed, citing how consumer products no longer contain asbestos (a known carcinogen).
Support for LAist comes from
Echeverria argued in her lawsuit that if Johnson & Johnson had provided proper warning labels on its products she would have stopped using their baby powder. The jury awarded Echeverria $70 million in compensatory damages and $347 million in punitive damages, according to the L.A. Times.
Echeverria, who is currently undergoing cancer treatment according to her attorney, wanted "to help the other women throughout the whole country who have ovarian cancer from using Johnson & Johnson for 20 and 30 years, according to CBS. In May, a St. Louis jury awarded $110.5 million to a Virginia woman who made similar cancer allegations. Echeverria's case is the first of the California lawsuits to go to trial, according to Reuters.
In a statement, Johnson & Johnson said they would appeal the jury's decision and cited scientific evidence supporting the safety of its products.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago. -
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
Best of LAist