Support for LAist comes from
Made of L.A.
Stay Connected

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.


Give More Expensive Parking Tickets to Repeat Violators, Says UCLA Professor

Our June member drive is live: protect this resource!
Right now, we need your help during our short June member drive to keep the local news you read here every day going. This has been a challenging year, but with your help, we can get one step closer to closing our budget gap. Today, put a dollar value on the trustworthy reporting you rely on all year long. We can't hold those in power accountable and uplift voices from the community without your partnership.

Photo by Atwater Village Newbie via LAist Featured Photos on Flickr

Photo by Atwater Village Newbie via LAist Featured Photos on Flickr
As "parking guru," UCLA's Donald Shoup is credited with influencing how cities shape their parking policies to improve mobility and neighborhoods. But today in the LA Times, he goes after a different angle in parking: tickets.

Shoup notes that many of the total tickets given out during a year are given to the same people. "In Los Angeles, for example, 8% of all the license plates that received tickets in 2009 accounted for 29% of all the tickets in that year," he said. "In Beverly Hills, 5% of license plates accounted for 24% of all tickets."

The problem is that repeat violators often take up spaces, lanes (double parking) and handicap zones, making it harder for law-abiding drivers to find a space in some busy areas. And if parking is difficult, local businesses can suffer. Shoup says most people never or rarely get tickets, but increasing fines -- something Los Angeles has done twice in recent years to help the budget crisis -- punishes everyone. Instead, he opines, gradually raise fines for repeat violators.

Support for LAist comes from

One of Shoup's most important points is to create better relations between the public, parking officers and city hall. If parking tickets are primarily seen as a city fundraiser, it creates tension, but if they are seen as an effective enforcement model, more people will get behind the concept. Ideally, for minor infractions like overtime parking, the first violation would be a warning instead of a citation. "The warnings show citizens that the city aims to encourage compliance rather than to raise revenue," he explained. "Flat-rate parking fines are like treating hardened criminals and first-time offenders equally."

Question is, will there ever be a day in L.A. where a motion to lower parking fines and institute this sort of system be approved?

Most Read