Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Street Vendors Sue City: They're Illegally Destroying Our Street Carts
Save the paletas (Photo by Steven Bevacqua via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr)
()
Sidewalk vendors who sell food and goods are suing the city of Los Angeles, arguing that the seizure of their carts by the city is unconstitutional.
The lawsuit was filed in federal court on Wednesday by the ACLU Foundation of Southern California and other civil rights groups on behalf of vendors in downtown L.A.'s Fashion District, reports CBS LA. While sidewalk vending is illegal in L.A., the practice continues, as evidenced by the countless bacon-wrapped hot dog stands and other wares sold in many neighborhoods. The suit argues that the police and the Fashion District's Business Improvement District are harassing vendors, illegally destroying carts and property and threatening some with deportation.
When carts are cleared, officers are supposed to provide a receipt to vendors if their carts and wares are taken as evidence. But vendors represented in the suit—an alliance known as Union Popular de Vendedores Ambulantes—are claiming that the LAPD, working with the neighborhood's business improvement district, frequently trash or confiscate carts without providing receipts, even if no arrest has been made of the vendor, according to the Times. Violation of the current law can sometimes lead to jail time and fines up to $1000.
"Every day in Los Angeles, street vendors have their hard-earned property illegally confiscated and destroyed," Cynthia Anderson-Barker, National Lawyers Guild attorney, said in a statement Wednesday, according to the Times. "[Such] unjust law enforcement practices ... push these productive members of our community further into poverty."
Support for LAist comes from
Vendors have been fighting to legalize street vending on sidewalks, as well as beaches and parks, and the city is even considering possible ways to legalize the practice. But the vendors involved in the suit contend that they've reached a point where they “have no choice but to bring this fight into the courtroom,” according to CBS LA.
“We’re not here to confiscate people’s property. We’re trying to keep the district clean,” Kent Smith, executive director of the Fashion District's Business Improvement District, tells the Times. Smith argues that the streets in the neighborhood are too narrow and busy for vendors' carts, which pose a safety hazard. He also contends that vendors often ditch their carts when police and county health officials show up to look for illegal vending.“That abandoned property needs to be dealt with. That’s what we do."
The office of City Attorney Mike Feuer told the Times that they don't comment on pending lawsuits against the city.
The lawsuit seeks financial compensation for the destroyed property and an order from the city to stop punishing vendors. Currently, vendors have no way to challenge the punishment or get their property back before it's trashed, according to the suit.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist