Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
ACLU Files Lawsuit Against Los Angeles, Saying Gang Injunctions Violate Constitutional Rights
Photo by cyan7 via the LAist Feature Photos pool on Flickr)
()
The ACLU has brought forward a lawsuit (PDF) against the City of Los Angeles and the LAPD for their gang injunctions, which they say violates Constitutional due process rights."Part of the problem is the way the cities go about getting injunctions," Peter Bibring, a senior staff attorney at the ACLU, told LAist. When seeking an injunction, officials name a gang (instead of individuals), which are not legal entities. "Without anybody meaningfully contesting" these requests, says Birbring, all 46 injunctions currently enforced by the LAPD have been granted on default judgments.
"LAPD officers and deputy city attorneys... make a determination behind closed doors and unilaterally decide who should be subjected to the parole-like conditions of the injunctions, based on vague guidelines that supposedly indicate gang membership, such as whether a person wears certain brands of clothing, hangs out with other suspected gang members, or spends time in suspected gang areas," according to the ACLU in a statement.
Under the gang injunctions, over 9,000 Los Angeles residents in a total area of about 75 square miles are subject to restrictions where they may not be allowed to socialize with people suspected to be gang members (including fellow family members), wear certain colors suspected to be gang affiliated, or even carry a pager or highlighters (which could be used for tagging).
"It's pretty cruel. I don't see how the LAPD can enforce the law saying that you can't be with your family," Peter Arellano, a 21-year-old Echo Park resident told the L.A. Times. "I think it's like inhumane. It's like when a dog has puppies, and you take the puppies away from the dog. It's just sad."
Support for LAist comes from
Arellano and Jose Reza, a former Ramona Gardens resident, are the two plaintiffs named in the lawsuit, which was filed by the ACLU on behalf of the Youth Justice Coalition.
In 2007, the city established a process by which individuals could apply to be removed from an injunction. However, such a process is "painstakingly slow," according to the complaint, and can take up to a year for someone's name to be removed. Less than 50 people have had their name removed from an injunction since the this process was put in place.
L.A. was one of the first cities to use gang injunctions as a tactic to curb crime, beginning in 1987 with an injunction against the Playboy Gangster Crips. "The city of L.A. certainly has more injunctions than any jurisdiction in the country," said Birbring. "They were pioneered here and most used here."
LAist reached out to both the LAPD and the Los Angeles City Attorney's Office but did not receive a comment. A spokesperson for the LAPD said the department does not comment on pending litigation.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Kimmel returned less than a week after ABC suspended his show over comments he made about the assassination of right wing activist Charlie Kirk. -
Southern California might see some light rain tonight into Wednesday morning. After that, cooler weather is on the way, but expect the humidity to remain. -
A gate tax at Disney? It's a possibility. -
UCLA and University of California leaders are fighting Trump’s demands for a $1.2 billion settlement over a litany of accusations, including that the campus permits antisemitism. -
Wasteland Weekend is all about souped-up rust buckets, spikey costumes and an ‘ideal apocalypse.’ -
The Shadow the Scientists initiative at UC Santa Cruz strives to demystify astronomical research.
Best of LAist