With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
FTC sues Live Nation and Ticketmaster alleging illegal resale tactics

The Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit against Ticketmaster and its parent company, Live Nation, on Thursday, alleging the company willingly misleads consumers about ticket prices and cooperates with scalpers to markup resale prices — all at the expense of artists and music fans. Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Nebraska, Tennessee, Utah and Virginia are all plaintiffs in the FTC's complaints.
"American live entertainment is the best in the world and should be accessible to all of us," FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson said in a statement. "It should not cost an arm and a leg to take the family to a baseball game or attend your favorite musician's show."
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, accuses Ticketmaster and Live Nation — the largest ticketing and live entertainment company in the country — of participating in three main illegal practices.
First, the FTC alleges that Ticketmaster engages in a "bait-and-switch approach," meaning they post ticket prices at deceptively low prices that then increase by 30% or more during checkout due to additional fees. The complaint alleges that Ticketmaster has "reaped massive profits by misrepresenting the total price of tickets to consumers, who pay billions of dollars each year in mandatory fees not reflected in the list price."
Although artists set prices and limits for how many tickets each user can buy in an attempt to make the process more accessible for fans, the FTC also alleges that Ticketmaster knowingly allows scalpers to exceed these limits. According to the lawsuit, "brokers" are able to purchase thousands of tickets to a single event, then resell them on Ticketmaster's secondary market for significantly higher prices. The FTC says this is possible because Ticketmaster and Live Nation "knowingly allow, and in fact even encourage, brokers to use multiple Ticketmaster accounts to circumvent Ticketmaster's own security measures and access control Systems," which is a direct violation of the Better Online Ticket Sales Act.
While Ticketmaster has argued that scalpers and bots are the reason fans miss out on face value tickets in the first place, the FTC claims Ticketmaster is knowingly benefiting from this system by "triple dipping" on fees — first when scalpers buy them in the primary market, followed by when they list them on the resale market and finally when fans buy them secondhand. The FTC estimates that Ticketmaster has charged $3.7 billion in fees on resale tickets from 2019 through 2024.
Live Nation and Ticketmaster have not responded to NPR's requests for comment.
The FTC complaint follows an antitrust lawsuit filed by the Department of Justice and 30 states in 2024 to break up Ticketmaster and Live Nation, citing concerns that an illegal monopoly over ticketing, promotion, venue ownership and management could drive up ticket prices.
"The DOJ's lawsuit won't lower ticket prices for fans or address the issues they care about — service fees and access to in-demand shows," Live Nation said in a statement to NPR earlier this year. "The real problem is the secondary market where resellers drive up prices and siphon billions out of the industry, hurting both artists and fans."
Last August, the United Kingdom's Competition and Market Authority launched an investigation into Ticketmaster's use of dynamic pricing for Oasis reunion ticket sales. In 2022, Taylor Swift fans filed a lawsuit against Ticketmaster and Live Nation accusing the companies of price gouging tickets for the Eras Tour.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.
-
Distrito Catorce’s Guillermo Piñon says the team no longer reflects his community. A new mural will honor local leaders instead.
-
The program is for customers in communities that may not be able to afford turf removal or water-saving upgrades.
-
More than half of sales through September have been to corporate developers. Grassroots community efforts continue to work to combat the trend.
-
The bill would increase penalties for metal recyclers who possess or purchase metal used in public infrastructure.
-
The new ordinance applies to certain grocers operating in the city and has led to some self-checkout lanes to shutter.