Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Food

Three L.A. Men Are Suing Chipotle Because They Felt Too Full After Finishing Their Burritos

chipotle_burrito.jpg
(Likely) more than 300 calories. (Photo by ABAZABA!! via the LAist Pool of Photos on Flickr)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

David Desmond couldn't believe his eyes when he walked into the Brentwood Chipotle and saw a gleeful sign advertising a 300 calorie chorizo burrito. It was too good to be true. 300 calories? In a burrito? And it came with white rice, black beans, fresh tomato salsa and a sprinkle of cheese? Surely, something must have been wrong.

Eager to experiment with Chipotle's apparently new low-calorie option, Desmond purchased the advertised burrito. While eating it however, he realized something was wrong. From a complaint, filed this week in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Desmond claims that he "felt excessively full and realized that the burrito couldn't have been just 300 calories," after eating the entire thing.

Similar circumstances unfolded in the days following Desmond's unfortunate overeating incident. When Edward Gurevich purchased an uncannily similar burrito at a Chipotle location in Burbank, he too was alarmed at the burrito's apparent size. Though he was also under the impression he burrito he purchased contained only 300 calories, the burrito he ultimately consumed likely contained three to four times that value. The same thing happened to Young Hoon Kim, who also claims he felt bloated after he consumed a purportedly 300 calorie burrito at a Chipotle location inside the Century City Westfield mall.

On Tuesday, Desmond, Gurevich and Kim filed a lawsuit against Chipotle that claims the fast-casual dining chain 'lulls' its customers into "into a false belief that the items they are eating are healthier than they really are," according to City News Service. They claim that a mislabeled sign is grounds for a class action lawsuit, and are suing the company on behalf of—get this—all people who have eaten at Chipotle in the past four years.

As restitution, the three men are seeking unspecified damages and an injunction against Chipotle that prohibits the company from using allegedly misleading information in its advertising and promotional campaigns.

Altogether, Desmond, Gurevich and Kim claim that the company's advertising misleads consumers into believing, somehow, that burritos weighing more than a pound are healthy. The company's pomp about “food with integrity," its “responsibility raised” meat, and Chipotle's “healthy eating mantra," all do little to counter the objectively unhealthy effect of a 700 calorie bag of chips.

Sponsored message

That's about all the news we've got on this one. Trawling through Twitter netted this keen find of the erroneous advertisement. It definetly does say 300 calories, but—and don't take our word for it—what probably happened is a human being made a mistake. Stay tuned, but please don't forget that lawsuits like this are why America is great, again. Imagine living in a country where you didn't have the right to sue a fast-food chain because somebody mislabeled a sign. They exist!

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today