Support for LAist comes from
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Stay Connected
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Listen

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Arts and Entertainment

LaBute's Adaptation of 'Miss Julie' a Major Disappointment

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive. 

The thing about doing film remakes is that, aesthetically at least, one should only do them if one has something genuinely new to say about the material or if the original was a diamond in the rough and ripe for improvement. In the theatre world, this same rule holds true for adaptations. Unfortunately, Neil LaBute's current adaptation of August Strindberg's Miss Julie is a lackluster affair, and miscasting in the Geffen Playhouse production hurts it further.

In LaBute's reimagining, the story is set in Long Island just before the Great Depression hits in 1929, when the "haves" are still securely lording it over the "have-nots." Julie (Lily Rabe), the 25-year-old daughter of a well-to-do family, has just had her fiancé break off their wedding engagement, and as the play starts she's partying with the servants while her folks are out of town. As the evening progresses, she flirts intensely with her father's valet, John (Logan Marshall-Green), even though she knows the cook, Kristine (Laura Heisler) is his girlfriend. Julie soon finds she's out of her depth in the real world, where actions have permanent consequences.

Although Rabe is generally a terrific actress, she never seems to connect to her character here. Her performance skips entitled young woman and lands instead upon bored rich cougar, which gives an entirely different and less credible dynamic to the play. Also, I'm not sure if director Jo Bonney and LaBute intend Julie to come off as humorously overwrought at the show's conclusion, but I don't believe Strindberg did.

Marshall-Green succeeds in displaying levels of complexity as John, but his period accent is a bit too reminiscent of Guys and Dolls. Heisler is quite good as the unappreciated Kristine, injured but resilient, but I felt sorry for her having to pretend to be asleep onstage for forty minutes or so.

Support for LAist comes from

Bonney's direction seems unengaged, not bringing much to the party. She might at least have noticed the inappropriate laughs happening in the play's final third, or reined in the accents (Rabe at times seems to be British). LaBute's contribution to this "adaptation" seems miniscule. I glanced at a copy of Strindberg's actual play after the show, and this seems substantially to be the exact same work with almost the same wording. The one thing I know LaBute contributed, the new time and setting, adds nothing of note to the show, and because Strindberg's dialogue largely remains it retains a Swedish flavor that makes the new setting unbelievable. Considering all of the talents involved, this production is a serious disappointment.

"Miss Julie" plays through June 2 at the Geffen Playhouse. Tickets are available online.

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist