Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Petition To Pardon 'Making A Murderer' Subject Gets Over 200,000 Signatures
A petition to pardon Steven Avery, a Wisconsin man charged with murdering a 25-year-old woman in 2005, has collected nearly 200,000 signatures since his case was explored in the Netflix documentary Making a Murderer. It's a case so convoluted you might lose yourself down a Reddit rabbit hole for days if you aren't careful. (Confession: I did.) Netflix's true-crime docuseries Making a Murderer from filmmakers Moira Demos and Laura Ricciardi explores the bizarre case of Steven Avery, a Wisconsin man who spent 18 years in prison for a crime he didn't commit, then was convicted of murdering a photographer only a few years after his release. The way the ten-part documentary is presented, the viewer is led to believe that Avery was framed by the same law enforcement officers who wrongly put him behind bars the first time. Other evidence against Avery not presented in the documentary has surfaced since its release, but even so, there's some clearly shady police work going on in Manitowoc County.
A petition on Change.org asking for President Barack Obama to pardon Avery has gathered over 200,000 signatures. However, since it wasn't a federal conviction, Obama has no power to pardon Avery, according to VICE. A petition on Whitehouse.gov asking for pardons for both Steven Avery and his nephew, Brendan Dassey, who was also convicted of the murder, has gathered over 20,000 signatures. By comparison, a Change.org petitionasking for a fair trial for Adnan Syed, the subject of podcast Serial who was convicted of murdering his girlfriend when he was 18, has over 30,000 signatures.
Viewers are torn over whether Avery and Dassey committed the murder, if Avery acted alone, if someone else committed the murder or if it was all an elaborate scheme on behalf of crooked law enforcement. Pretty much any theory you want to support, you can find someone else on the Internet who's right there with you.
The story begins in 1985, when a woman named Penny Beernsten is brutally assaulted and raped while jogging on the shore of Lake Michigan. The documentary indicates that from the get-go, the police in Manitowoc County had their sights set on Avery being the perpetrator. Despite a then 23-year-old Avery having an alibi for the entire day on which the attack occurred, he was still convicted based solely on Beernsten's certainty that he was the one who attacked her—which the documentary indicates may have been caused by the police's own certainty. (Beensten talks about this in a fascinating episode of Radiolab available here.) In actuality, the man who attacked her was serial rapist Gregory Allen. However, Avery would continue to sit behind bars for 18 years until finally, DNA evidence exonerated him and pointed to Allen. At this time, Allen was already in jail for another sexual assault. Weirder yet, police had every reason to suspect Allen in the Beernsten case: they were already monitoring him regularly, convinced he was going to commit a sexual assault based on previous behavior. Not only that, but Allen even told authorities that he had committed an assault that someone else was doing time for, eight years before DNA evidence freed Avery.
Avery was ultimately released in 2003 and sued the County. He was set to win a certain amount of money that he would have used to continue his legal battle. However, he was soon charged with the murder of 25-year-old Teresa Halbach, a photographer who went missing after visiting the Avery family's auto salvage yard to photograph a vehicle for Auto Trader Magazine, where Haibach worked as a freelance photographer. While the evidence against Avery is compelling—it includes Halbach's car found on Avery's salvage lot with his blood inside—the documentary and Avery's lawyers point to conspiracy on behalf of the police. And authorities certainly had the motive: Avery's first case was laden with shoddy police work, and they were potentially going to have to pay him a lot of money. The documentary also shows footage of Dassey's interrogation. Watching investigators lead 16-year-old Dassey—whose IQ hovers around 70—to incriminating statements is cringe-inducing.
The documentary leaves out other key pieces of evidence, including that Avery's DNA was found on the hood latch of Halbach's car, as well as conversations between Dassey and his mother that indicated Avery may have molested him in the past. Moira Demos responded to allegations from the prosecutor in the case, Ken Kratz, that the filmmakers left out key pieces, saying: "I guess I would ask Kratz what he would trade it for. We tried to choose what we thought was Kratz's strongest evidence pointing toward Steven's guilt, the things he talked about at his press conferences, the things that were really damning toward Steven. That's what we put in."
Regardless, things aren't lining up for people, and that's why this documentary has everyone scratching their heads and signing petitions.
If you're done watching Making a Murderer and need another bewildering case to mull over, we suggest checking out Lost Compassion. This documentary explores the mysterious death of Mitrice Richardson, a young woman who was found dead in Malibu Hills in 2010 after disappearing in 2009. The film just won "Best Documentary" at the Malibu Film Festival, and we should be getting some additional screenings soon.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.