Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Arts & Entertainment

Charles Saatchi Is Divorcing Nigella Lawson Because She Didn't Defend Him After Photos Of Him Choking Her

nigella-lawson.jpg
Nigella Lawson at The Langham Huntington Hotel and Spa on January 10, 2013 in Pasadena, California. (Photo by Toby Canham/Getty Images)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

What a gentleman! Multimillionaire art collector Charles Saatchi's response to pictures showing him putting his hands around the neck of his wife chef Nigella Lawson wasn't to apologize or promise never to lay a hand on her again. Instead he gave an interview with The Daily Mail explaining that he is the one divorcing his wife because she had the nerve to not publicly defend him after those disturbing pictures came out.He told The Mail: "I feel that I have clearly been a disappointment to Nigella during the last year or so, and I am disappointed that she was advised to make no public comment to explain that I abhor violence of any kind against women, and have never abused her physically in any way."

Saatchi was caught on camera clutching his wife's throat during an argument at a restaurant on June 9. She later left the restaurant in tears after their argument. A week later when those photos were released, Lawson fled with her 17-year-old son Bruno and the pair haven't spoken since. Lawson's PR firm asked Saatchi to publicly apologize for the "assault" and admit he was "ashamed." Lawson agreed this was a good plan of action, but Saatchi refused. Now he blames Lawson for taking her PR firm's advice for the downfall of their marriage.

Saatchi says did not want to admit to "assaulting" her publicly, because he believed it wasn't true and it would put him in an uncomfortable position with law enforcement. He defended his actions, saying they were "not violent" and there was "no pressure applied to her." He says, "We are instinctively tactile people" and says that her hands could have easily been around his own neck. He claims the version of events she gave to police matches his own.

The Daily Mail reports that when the couple were notified that a story would be running about their tiff at a restaurant, neither of them thought anything of it. The day the photos came out changed everything.

It seemed to reveal something about their relationship to Lawson that wasn't obvious before. Friends told The Daily Mail that Lawson was afraid of Saatchi's temper and his verbal lashings, but she said that he "never lifted a finger to her." But since the photos came out, Lawson has refused to receive his calls or texts. Friends told the tabloid that she was disturbed that Saatchi played down the whole event by calling it a "playful tiff."

And apparently Lawson didn't know that divorce papers were headed her way, until Saatchi's statement was released in The Mail. The paper reports, "Ms Lawson is not aware of the divorce ultimatum being issued by her husband today and will be devastated by his claim that she is somehow to blame for failing to speak out in his defence."

And we thought a text-message divorce was rough.

Sponsored message

Related:
Nigella Lawson Leaves Scumbag Hubby After Public Choking Incident
Nigella Lawson Leaves Tool Bag Hubby And Heads To L.A.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today