Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Charles Saatchi Is Divorcing Nigella Lawson Because She Didn't Defend Him After Photos Of Him Choking Her
Nigella Lawson at The Langham Huntington Hotel and Spa on January 10, 2013 in Pasadena, California. (Photo by Toby Canham/Getty Images)
()
What a gentleman! Multimillionaire art collector Charles Saatchi's response to pictures showing him putting his hands around the neck of his wife chef Nigella Lawson wasn't to apologize or promise never to lay a hand on her again. Instead he gave an interview with The Daily Mail explaining that he is the one divorcing his wife because she had the nerve to not publicly defend him after those disturbing pictures came out.He told The Mail: "I feel that I have clearly been a disappointment to Nigella during the last year or so, and I am disappointed that she was advised to make no public comment to explain that I abhor violence of any kind against women, and have never abused her physically in any way."
Saatchi was caught on camera clutching his wife's throat during an argument at a restaurant on June 9. She later left the restaurant in tears after their argument. A week later when those photos were released, Lawson fled with her 17-year-old son Bruno and the pair haven't spoken since. Lawson's PR firm asked Saatchi to publicly apologize for the "assault" and admit he was "ashamed." Lawson agreed this was a good plan of action, but Saatchi refused. Now he blames Lawson for taking her PR firm's advice for the downfall of their marriage.
Saatchi says did not want to admit to "assaulting" her publicly, because he believed it wasn't true and it would put him in an uncomfortable position with law enforcement. He defended his actions, saying they were "not violent" and there was "no pressure applied to her." He says, "We are instinctively tactile people" and says that her hands could have easily been around his own neck. He claims the version of events she gave to police matches his own.
The Daily Mail reports that when the couple were notified that a story would be running about their tiff at a restaurant, neither of them thought anything of it. The day the photos came out changed everything.
Support for LAist comes from
It seemed to reveal something about their relationship to Lawson that wasn't obvious before. Friends told The Daily Mail that Lawson was afraid of Saatchi's temper and his verbal lashings, but she said that he "never lifted a finger to her." But since the photos came out, Lawson has refused to receive his calls or texts. Friends told the tabloid that she was disturbed that Saatchi played down the whole event by calling it a "playful tiff."
And apparently Lawson didn't know that divorce papers were headed her way, until Saatchi's statement was released in The Mail. The paper reports, "Ms Lawson is not aware of the divorce ultimatum being issued by her husband today and will be devastated by his claim that she is somehow to blame for failing to speak out in his defence."
And we thought a text-message divorce was rough.
Related:
Nigella Lawson Leaves Scumbag Hubby After Public Choking Incident
Nigella Lawson Leaves Tool Bag Hubby And Heads To L.A.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist