Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Elon Musk, Bob Iger Leave Trump's Advisory Councils After Administration's Split From Paris Climate Accord [Updated]

Elon Musk says he's leaving two White House advisory councils as a response to President Trump's decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accord. Musk had served on two panels that focused, separately, on manufacturing and economics, reports the L.A. Times.
Musk announced his decision on, what else, Twitter:
Am departing presidential councils. Climate change is real. Leaving Paris is not good for America or the world.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 1, 2017
He followed it up with tweet reminding us that China is making strides under the Paris Climate Accord:
Under Paris deal, China committed to produce as much clean electricity by 2030 as the US does from all sources today https://t.co/F8Ppr2o7Rl
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 1, 2017
Musk had made his stance clear during the days before Trump's decision:
Don't know which way Paris will go, but I've done all I can to advise directly to POTUS, through others in WH & via councils, that we remain
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 31, 2017
Other notable figures in tech made similar pleas with the President—according to Bloomberg, Apple's Tim Cook had personally called the White House to urge the president to stay with the agreement.
Musk's decision to join the President's advisory team was marked with controversy, as some had criticized Musk for associating with Trump (the two men are ideologically opposed on the topic of climate change, among other things). Musk also met backlash for his support of Trump's decision to establish Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State.
Responding to the criticism, Musk has maintained that he's serving on the councils to "make a positive contribution." When the first iteration of the travel ban was announced in January, the pressure for Musk to quit the team intensified. As reported at Fortune, Musk decided to stay on, saying in a statement that while he opposed the ban, he also thought his presence could help "accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy and to help make humanity a multi-planet civilization, a consequence of which will be the creation of hundreds of thousands of jobs and a more inspiring future for all." He added, "I believe at this time that engaging on critical issues will on balance serve the greater good."
In January, Musk spoke with Gizmodo about the prospect of a carbon tax that's used to, theoretically, help reduce emissions. When asked about the plausibility of a carbon tax in a Trump administration (Gizmodo noted that the President had made claims that global warming is a hoax), Musk said that the publication was "missing the point," adding that, "This is something we need to strive for and the more voices of reason that the President hears, the better. Simply attacking him will achieve nothing. Are you aware of a single case where Trump bowed to protests or media attacks? Better that there are open channels of communication."
Upon learning of Musk's decision to quit the council, some on Twitter referred to Musk's past statements:
I thought having a seat at the table was the only way to affect change? ....
— Josh Olin | @Rug_Radar Presale ⏸ (@JD_2020) June 1, 2017
I'm just curious as to why the change of plan. Is it felt like the only way to send a message is now to boycott the administration?
— Josh Olin | @Rug_Radar Presale ⏸ (@JD_2020) June 1, 2017
Some also implored him to stay on the councils:
Somehow I think you could do more good for the world by staying on the councils. Leaving only makes things worse. They need your brain, sir
— Doriano Carta (@Paisano) June 1, 2017
But nah:
Trump can't be reasoned with. He doesn't care about facts. Elon's time is better spent fighting him elsewhere.
— shauna (@goldengateblond) June 1, 2017
As noted at CNN Money, there's plenty at stake for Musk, as SpaceX has relied on government funding. The company is working with a $1.6 billion contract from NASA to send supplies to the International Space Station. It also signed on for an $82.7 million contract to send a U.S. Air Force satellite into space in 2018.
LAist reached out to SpaceX to see if Musk has an additional statement about his decision to leave the councils, but have yet to hear back at time of publication.
[Update: 4:45 p.m.]
As reported by Variety, Disney CEO Bob Iger has also announced his decision to leave a White House advisory council—named the "President’s Strategic and Policy Forum"—as a response to the president's decision on the Climate Accord:
As a matter of principle, I've resigned from the President's Council over the #ParisAgreement withdrawal.
— Robert Iger (@RobertIger) June 1, 2017
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.