Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Criminal Justice

What You Need to Know About California’s New Law To Get Rid Of Bad Cops

An image of the LAPD headquarters. There's a sign of the LAPD and its auditorium.
LAPD Headquarters in front of City Hall.
(
Chava Sanchez
/
LAist
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

Gov. Newsom Thursday signed into law a hotly debated bill that creates a system for yanking a law enforcement officer’s license to carry a badge for engaging in serious misconduct, including excessive use of force, dishonesty, and racial bias. All but four other states already have a decertification law but police leaders and unions in California had long opposed one here.

The legislation was introduced in the wake of the murder of George Floyd and became a top priority for police watchdogs and activists. It’s designed not only to make sure bad cops are fired, but to prevent an officer who has engaged in misconduct at one department from getting a job at another law enforcement agency.

“Today marks another step toward healing and justice for all,” said Newsom. “Too many lives have been lost due to racial profiling and excessive use of force.”

Police unions lobbied fiercely against the bill, saying the definition of serious misconduct was vague and that the civilian advisory board it creates would have too much influence in the process.

Sponsored message

The law creates a “biased and unclear process for revoking an officer’s license,” Brian Marvel, president of the Peace Officers Research Association of California, told CalMatters this summer.

The bill was sponsored by Sen. Steven Bradford, (D-Gardena).

“This bill is not just about holding bad officers accountable for their misconduct,” said its sponsor, Sen. Steven Bradford (D-Gardena). “It’s also about building trust between our communities and law enforcement.”

“We don’t hate the police,” he said. “We fear the police due to lack of trust.”

The bill was known as the Kenneth Ross Jr. Police Decertification Act - named for a 25-year-old Black man who was fatally shot with an AR-15 by a Gardena officer as he fled police through Rowley Park in 2018. Newsom signed the bill in the park with Ross’ family standing next to him.

Ross had a gun and then-DA Jackie Lacey said it appeared he was in a mental health crisis but she concluded the shooting was legally justified. The now-retired officer who shot him — Michael Robbins — had worked at the Orange Police Department previously and been involved in at least one shooting there. It’s not clear if he would have been subject to decertification under this bill.

Here’s what you need to know about the new law:

  • Reporting. Starting Jan. 1, 2023, law enforcement agencies must to report to the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) allegations of serious misconduct that could result in the revocation or suspension of an officer’s certification. Police agencies must also report civil judgements and findings by oversight entities of serious misconduct.
  • Investigations. The commission must create a new division to investigate or review possible misconduct.
  • Advisory Panel. The law calls for the creation of a nine-member civilian advisory board to recommend whether to decertify an officer. The majority of the board must be composed of people without policing experience, including two who either personally suffered from an officer’s use of force or lost a loved one to it.
  • The Evidence. Any recommendation for decertification of an officer must be based on clear and convincing evidence, which means the evidence is “highly and substantially” more likely to be true than untrue.
  • Decisions. POST would make the final decision on decertification.
  • ”Serious Misconduct.” By Jan. 1, 2023, POST must adopt a specific definition of “serious misconduct.” The law broadly defines it as work-related dishonesty, abuse of power, falsely arresting someone, excessive force, sexual assault, biased policing, participation in law enforcement gangs, and the failure by a peace officer to intercede when witnessing excessive force by other officers.

At LAist, we focus on what matters to our community: clear, fair, and transparent reporting that helps you make decisions with confidence and keeps powerful institutions accountable.

Your support for independent local news is critical. With federal funding for public media gone, LAist faces a $1.7 million yearly shortfall. Speaking frankly, how much reader support we receive now will determine the strength of this reliable source of local information now and for years to come.

This work is only possible with community support. Every investigation, service guide, and story is made possible by people like you who believe that local news is a public good and that everyone deserves access to trustworthy local information.

That’s why we’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Thank you for understanding how essential it is to have an informed community and standing up for free press.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right