With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
What You Need to Know About California’s New Law To Get Rid Of Bad Cops
Gov. Newsom Thursday signed into law a hotly debated bill that creates a system for yanking a law enforcement officer’s license to carry a badge for engaging in serious misconduct, including excessive use of force, dishonesty, and racial bias. All but four other states already have a decertification law but police leaders and unions in California had long opposed one here.
The legislation was introduced in the wake of the murder of George Floyd and became a top priority for police watchdogs and activists. It’s designed not only to make sure bad cops are fired, but to prevent an officer who has engaged in misconduct at one department from getting a job at another law enforcement agency.
“Today marks another step toward healing and justice for all,” said Newsom. “Too many lives have been lost due to racial profiling and excessive use of force.”
Police unions lobbied fiercely against the bill, saying the definition of serious misconduct was vague and that the civilian advisory board it creates would have too much influence in the process.
The law creates a “biased and unclear process for revoking an officer’s license,” Brian Marvel, president of the Peace Officers Research Association of California, told CalMatters this summer.
The bill was sponsored by Sen. Steven Bradford, (D-Gardena).
“This bill is not just about holding bad officers accountable for their misconduct,” said its sponsor, Sen. Steven Bradford (D-Gardena). “It’s also about building trust between our communities and law enforcement.”
“We don’t hate the police,” he said. “We fear the police due to lack of trust.”
The bill was known as the Kenneth Ross Jr. Police Decertification Act - named for a 25-year-old Black man who was fatally shot with an AR-15 by a Gardena officer as he fled police through Rowley Park in 2018. Newsom signed the bill in the park with Ross’ family standing next to him.
Ross had a gun and then-DA Jackie Lacey said it appeared he was in a mental health crisis but she concluded the shooting was legally justified. The now-retired officer who shot him — Michael Robbins — had worked at the Orange Police Department previously and been involved in at least one shooting there. It’s not clear if he would have been subject to decertification under this bill.
Here’s what you need to know about the new law:
- Reporting. Starting Jan. 1, 2023, law enforcement agencies must to report to the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) allegations of serious misconduct that could result in the revocation or suspension of an officer’s certification. Police agencies must also report civil judgements and findings by oversight entities of serious misconduct.
- Investigations. The commission must create a new division to investigate or review possible misconduct.
- Advisory Panel. The law calls for the creation of a nine-member civilian advisory board to recommend whether to decertify an officer. The majority of the board must be composed of people without policing experience, including two who either personally suffered from an officer’s use of force or lost a loved one to it.
- The Evidence. Any recommendation for decertification of an officer must be based on clear and convincing evidence, which means the evidence is “highly and substantially” more likely to be true than untrue.
- Decisions. POST would make the final decision on decertification.
- ”Serious Misconduct.” By Jan. 1, 2023, POST must adopt a specific definition of “serious misconduct.” The law broadly defines it as work-related dishonesty, abuse of power, falsely arresting someone, excessive force, sexual assault, biased policing, participation in law enforcement gangs, and the failure by a peace officer to intercede when witnessing excessive force by other officers.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
-
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol.
-
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails.
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.