Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Lawsuit Seeks To Force LAUSD To Reopen Campuses For Small Groups Of At-Risk Students

Two advocacy organizations have asked the California Supreme Court to force the Los Angeles Unified School District to resume in-person instruction for small groups of the highest-need students.
The lawsuit, filed Friday morning, comes one day after LAUSD Superintendent Austin Beutner imposed a harder campus lockdown: he suspended the district’s already-limited tutoring, small group and childcare programs until at least Jan. 10.
WHAT THE LAWSUIT SAYS
With coronavirus cases surging in recent weeks, LAUSD officials argue inviting students to campuses is “no longer safe and appropriate.”
But the Alliance for Children’s Rights and the Learning Rights Law Center argue LAUSD’s shutdown violates Senate Bill 98, the legislation passed last June that established some ground rules for distance learning during COVID-19.
Among SB 98’s rules: public schools should make plans “to offer classroom-based instruction whenever possible.”
“LAUSD is not the arbiter of when [classroom-based instruction] is ‘possible,’” said Alex Romain, a partner at the firm Milbank LLP, which is handling the case. “Those judgment calls are left to public health officials … [who] have actually spoken on this particular point, and indicated that, since the middle of September, it has in fact been possible.”
Romain took the lawsuit directly to California’s highest court in hopes justices would take swift action. He hoped the court would order LAUSD not only to resume in-person instruction, but also to arrange and pay for immediate services for students with disabilities through private providers if necessary.
“There are real students who are being harmed in a profound way,” he said.
When we reached out earlier this afternoon, an LAUSD spokesperson said that the district had not yet been served with the lawsuit, "and we do not comment on pending litigation."
THE BACKGROUND
- In August, state public health officials urged schools to invite their most at-risk students — particularly students in special education, English learners, foster youth and homeless children — to return to campuses for instruction in small groups. (These are groups that have fared terribly in distance learning.)
- In September, the L.A. County Department of Public Health gave schools the go-ahead to begin this small group instruction, so long as the groups did not exceed 25% of a school’s overall student body.
- While Southern California is now under new stay-at-home orders, those mandates allow schools to continue offering some limited in-person instruction. But Beutner ordered LAUSD to suspend in-person services anyway, pointing out public health officials have called the recent surge in cases “dangerous."
WHY LAUSD?
Before the new lockdown, LAUSD had invited less than 1% of its students to participate in these targeted small groups — some 4,000 students.
But LAUSD officials are not alone in backing away from these small groups as COVID-19 cases mount.
Long Beach Unified — L.A. County’s second-largest district — has been offering even more-limited in-person services this semester than LAUSD has. According to its teachers union, Long Beach Unified decided to delay convening small groups of the most at-risk students until at least after winter break.
After the state announced its new stay-at-home order, Santa Ana Unified also cancelled all small group instruction “out of an abundance of caution.”
Romain said the lawsuit targeted LAUSD because that is where the organizations he represents, and the children they serve, are located.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.