Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Car Sharing Should Expand to Hollywood, Recommends City Report

On-campus and on-street car sharing around USC
Imagine this. You live in the Valley, work in Hollywood and you faithfully take the Metro Red Line subway every day to work. Why even bother with traffic? Or maybe, why even own car? Sometimes, however, you just need one in the middle of the day, say for a dentist's appointment across town. Thankfully, there is a car sharing program in Hollywood, so you go online, reserve a car parked in a special spot on the street and head out for a couple hours. That scenario could soon happen if the Los Angeles City Council approves a recommendation from the city's transportation staff. In a report (.pdf) to be discussed at a committee meeting this week, staff recommend extending a small on-street car sharing program only found around UCLA and USC.
For nearly a year, Zipcar and the city have tested out a project that has taken 18 on-street parking spaces near the two campuses and converted them into dedicated car sharing spaces (there is also a program that has vehicles parked in campus spaces). Students, faculty, office workers and residents then can go online, reserve the car for a couple hours (or maybe the whole day). Rates start at $8 per hour on weekdays and $9 on weekends. Gas, insurance and the first 180 miles are included in the price.

On-campus and on-street car sharing around UCLA
So far, the success of the program has gone beyond expectations, which has left the city staff and Zipcar with the desire to try something new: explore the viability of car sharing in a non-university area. And that neighborhood should be Hollywood near Metro stops, they say.The outcome could be far from predictable. The current near-campus program see 91% of its usage from students or faculty. But that could just be about location. "Perhaps most illustrative of the success of the neighborhood targeting approach is this statistic: significant 45% of people report living or working less than a block from a Zipcar location; 36.5% report being within one to three blocks," a report from the company stated, meaning if the Hollywood community embraces the program,
Another challenge for the program are drivers of non-car sharing vehicles parking in dedicate Zipcar spaces. Although car sharing spaces are marked to be restricted to regular vehicles, hundreds of vehicles have been towed and ticketed. In the first seven months of 2010, 384 tickets were written and 175 vehicles were towed.
Another issue is balancing on-street car sharing spaces and regular parking spots in congested areas.
City staff are also careful to point out that car sharing is not the one and only solution to the city's transportation demand, but one tool to enhance it. They see locating car sharing programs near rail and transit stations as an asset, encouraging "the use of transit by those whose trip destinations are not conveniently located within the reach of the transit system."
In 2007, Zipcar merged with its competitor Flexcar, which had around 50 cars in Los Angeles. The L.A. fleet was then reduced to an only on-campus program in 2007.
Previously: Car Sharing Program A Success, but Plans to Expand are Tentative (January, 2010)
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.