Sustain LAist today!

Make a monthly donation during our June member drive to power our local newsroom.
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Arts & Entertainment

2016 Was The Biggest Year Ever For Hollywood

31445689282_c2b15479f7_z.jpg

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

(Photo by Mike Hume via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr)

North Americans spent $11.3 billion on movies in 2016 (and an untold more in parking and popcorn costs), making the year the top grossing of all time. 2016 also clocked in 724 feature releases - another record.

According to Box Office Mojo, "Finding Dory" was the top domestic earner of 2016, pulling in $486 million.

"Captain America: Civil War" had the year’s biggest opening weekend (and the fifth biggest of all time) with $179 million for the three days following its May 6 release. It also ranked as the biggest world-wide earner, with over $1.1 billion in global ticket sales.

“Forgetful fish, super-heroes, household pets and space travelers led the charge in a year that was marked by an incredibly-diverse selection of films form every genre, and of every size and scope from all the studios,” Paul Degarabedian, senior media analyst at comScore, said, notes City News Service.

According to the Hollywood Reporter, the industry’s record comes despite a string of flops (did you see "Rules Don’t Apply"? Yeah, neither did I) and empty franchise films ("Assassin’s Creed", anyone?).

“I’ve talked to people at these companies, and they all seem to think the problem is they are putting out bad movies, as opposed to the consumers are demanding change," Doug Cruetz, an analyst for the Wall Street firm Cowen Group, said.

Sponsored message

He continued:

I think they are in denial about what’s going. I don’t know what they can do other than shut down a studio or two. …Just days after "Lights Out" or a "Secret Life of Pets" opens, a sequel is announced. They greenlight these movies without a script and say we need this movie in two or three years. It’s bad for the creative process. I don’t know that they have any other good options. In the old days, studios would have bad times and go bankrupt. Now they are owned by big conglomerates. They can lose money as far as they eye can see, but they are not going to go away.

But Disney chairman Alan Horn does not expect the studios’ strategy to change anytime soon. "It’s tough out there," Horn began. "I don’t think the competition for people’s time and attention has ever been more intense, and, simultaneously, as an industry we have a lot of films looking for a slice of the pie over the course of the summer. So whether it’s a franchise film or a brand-new concept, it is absolutely essential that we create compelling content that gets people to stop everything else they’re doing and go to the theater.”

According to Variety, Megan Colligan, marketing and distribution chief for Paramount, agrees that franchise films are still the most worth-while investment.

“You have to do a lot of work to convince people of why you made another movie and why they need to see it.”

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today