Support for LAist comes from
Local and national news, NPR, things to do, food recommendations and guides to Los Angeles, Orange County and the Inland Empire
Stay Connected
Listen

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Back to the Drawing Board for Ex-Urban Utopia

Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.

History confirms that LA's development has always been dependent on water and land annexation. These ingredients fuel our city's present development as well as its past.Back in April, things looked promising for the proposed 555-acre, mixed-use development known as Las Lomas when a judge blocked the City of Santa Clarita’s attempt to annex unincorporated land in its effort to thwart the controversial development.

Now the fate of developer Dan Palmer’s dream project has taken a different course. Inter-jurisdictional machinations might just put a serious dent in Palmer’s claim to being “an optimist by nature.”

According to the Daily News, the tentative agreement brokered between the cities of Los Angeles and Santa Clarita (with input from the County) calls for splitting “the Newhall Pass area along the ridgeline.” The two cities have expressed their intent to enforce stringent zoning which would effectively block a development of this size and scale from occurring at the unincorporated location.

Support for LAist comes from

Nearly six thousand homes -- along with commercial, retail, and ancillary structures and facilities -- were to be located near the interchange of the 5 and Antelope Valley freeways. This Newhall Pass site has other advantages. Las Lomas has been touted as an unconventional "urban" infill development, where infrastructure (i.e. water) is already available. Therefore, Palmer chose to apply to City of Los Angeles for the land use approval process instead of joining its neighbor -- recently incorporated Santa Clarita.

Santa Clarita made no bones about its opposition to the project, which the developer claims is “scaled to minimize offsite impacts.” (This assertion stands in stark contrast to the approximately 44,000 daily additional car trips, loss of open space, and other projected negative externalities.) Moreover, the contested land is steep and potentially unstable to support the proposed level of density.

Project opponents, including LA City Councilmen Greig Smith and Alex Padilla, were unconvinced by the details -- if not the vision and theory -- Palmer articulated to the Planning Report earlier this year:

As a community, we need to do what we already know are the right things. We need to invest in higher intensity and mixed-use developments. We need to develop projects with scaleable transit options. We need to make development forms more compact and less exploitative of green space. We need to locate the development where there’s an abundance or excess of infrastructure. We need to make schools fully integrated with the communities they serve. This is the ambition of Las Lomas -- to leap out of the dinner conversations and coffee klatches of the intelligentsia and into physical reality at a scale that can, in fact, be used as a model for the future...Las Lomas is attempting to borrow from the original utopian vision of the early Los Angeles as a garden city, promising an indoor/outdoor lifestyle with the Mediterranean plant palate and courtyard housing.”

While LAist thinks realizing these planning principles is absolutely crucial to the well-being of our rapidly expanding region, the impacts of this infill model are not easily mitigatable. And we don't have to start from scratch with romantic edenic notions of how life should be in Los Angeles, either.

As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.

Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.

We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.

No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.

Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.

Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist