Support for LAist comes from
True LA stories, powered by you
Stay Connected

Share This

Arts and Entertainment

The Pandemic Changed The Oscars This Year, And Maybe Hollywood Permanently

Preparations For The 93rd Annual Academy Awards show the red carpet and large letters spelling out OSCARS in front of L.A.'s Union Station
The red carpet is rolled out for the 93rd Academy Awards show at L.A.'s Union Station
(Chris Pizzello
/
Pool/Getty Images)
Our reporting is free for everyone, but it’s not free to make.
LAist only exists with reader support. If you're in a position to give, your donation powers our reporters and keeps us independent.

As much as Hollywood loves sequels, it has zero interest in repeating the industry’s past year, even if the pandemic may have fundamentally transformed the Academy Awards for the better.

While COVID-19’s effect on show business pales in comparison to the nearly 600,000 American deaths, its impact very likely will be lasting — not only in how we consume movies, but also in how we define movies themselves.

Even as digital technology has revolutionized how we consume entertainment, theater owners have clung to a primordial model that gives moviegoers no agency and choice.

The casualties of the pandemic aren’t limited to noteworthy theater chains that have served their last tub of popcorn: the most recently fallen include the Alamo Drafthouse (which hopes to return after a bankruptcy restructuring), and the ArcLight/Pacific chains. More broadly, the victims include a century-old distribution framework whose upending was long overdue.

Support for LAist comes from
arclight_hollywood.jpg
When the Arclight/Pacific Theatres chain closed, so did its landmark Cinerama Dome
(Photo by Bud Care )

When stay-at-home orders and social distancing essentially rendered that exhibition system not only unworkable but also outdated, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences promptly rewrote one of its cornerstone Oscar rules: No longer must a movie premiere in theaters to be Oscar-eligible; video-on-demand and streaming debuts would now qualify as well.

Even if the academy said the switch, announced a full year ago, was a “temporary exception,” its potency could be hardly that brief. As recently as two years ago, Steven Spielberg likened a film premiering on a streaming service to a “TV movie” that should compete for an Emmy and not an Oscar.

Academy Award voters see the divide quite differently, and believe quality trumps release platform. Only one of this year’s best film nominees comes from a major studio (“Judas and the Black Messiah” was released by Warner Bros.), and the two companies with the most nominations by far were streamers — Netflix, with 35, and Amazon, with 12.

Just as striking: the people who made and starred in those Oscar-worthy films. While the big studios postponed many of their planned 2020 movies sometimes, by more than a year, their delayed slates nevertheless were scarcely as diverse as this year’s contenders.

Support for LAist comes from

Thanks mostly to inclusive productions from streamers and independent distributors, a record nine actors of color are nominated for acting Oscars.

5fdbf1bf3d7c92000901a464-eight.jpg
The late Chadwick Boseman (playing trumpet) and Viola Davis each won SAG Awards. They "Ma Rainey's Black Bottom" stars could repeat at the Oscars.
(David Lee/Netflix
/
Getty)

And if several prognosticators are right, and if Academy voters mimic the SAG Awards results, four non-white performers could win this year’s acting statues: Viola Davis and the late Chadwick Boseman for lead actress and lead actor from “Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom,” Daniel Kuluuya from “Judas and the Black Messiah” for supporting actor, and “Minari’s” Yuh-Jung Youn for supporting actress.

And even if the Oscar rules are ultimately rewritten, the academy won't be able to rewrite what happened this year.