Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
The Pandemic Changed The Oscars This Year, And Maybe Hollywood Permanently
The red carpet is rolled out for the 93rd Academy Awards show at L.A.'s Union Station
(
Chris Pizzello
/
Pool/Getty Images
)
As much as Hollywood loves sequels, it has zero interest in repeating the industry’s past year, even if the pandemic may have fundamentally transformed the Academy Awards for the better.
While COVID-19’s effect on show business pales in comparison to the nearly 600,000 American deaths, its impact very likely will be lasting — not only in how we consume movies, but also in how we define movies themselves.
Even as digital technology has revolutionized how we consume entertainment, theater owners have clung to a primordial model that gives moviegoers no agency and choice.
The casualties of the pandemic aren’t limited to noteworthy theater chains that have served their last tub of popcorn: the most recently fallen include the Alamo Drafthouse (which hopes to return after a bankruptcy restructuring), and the ArcLight/Pacific chains. More broadly, the victims include a century-old distribution framework whose upending was long overdue.
Support for LAist comes from
When the Arclight/Pacific Theatres chain closed, so did its landmark Cinerama Dome
(
Photo by Bud Care
)
When stay-at-home orders and social distancing essentially rendered that exhibition system not only unworkable but also outdated, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences promptly rewrote one of its cornerstone Oscar rules: No longer must a movie premiere in theaters to be Oscar-eligible; video-on-demand and streaming debuts would now qualify as well.
Even if the academy said the switch, announced a full year ago, was a “temporary exception,” its potency could be hardly that brief. As recently as two years ago, Steven Spielberg likened a film premiering on a streaming service to a “TV movie” that should compete for an Emmy and not an Oscar.
Academy Award voters see the divide quite differently, and believe quality trumps release platform. Only one of this year’s best film nominees comes from a major studio (“Judas and the Black Messiah” was released by Warner Bros.), and the two companies with the most nominations by far were streamers — Netflix, with 35, and Amazon, with 12.
Just as striking: the people who made and starred in those Oscar-worthy films. While the big studios postponed many of their planned 2020 movies sometimes, by more than a year, their delayed slates nevertheless were scarcely as diverse as this year’s contenders.
Thanks mostly to inclusive productions from streamers and independent distributors, a record nine actors of color are nominated for acting Oscars.
The late Chadwick Boseman (playing trumpet) and Viola Davis each won SAG Awards. They "Ma Rainey's Black Bottom" stars could repeat at the Oscars.
(
David Lee/Netflix
/
Getty
)
Support for LAist comes from
And if several prognosticators are right, and if Academy voters mimic the SAG Awards results, four non-white performers could win this year’s acting statues: Viola Davis and the late Chadwick Boseman for lead actress and lead actor from “Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom,” Daniel Kuluuya from “Judas and the Black Messiah” for supporting actor, and “Minari’s” Yuh-Jung Youn for supporting actress.
And even if the Oscar rules are ultimately rewritten, the academy won't be able to rewrite what happened this year.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance. -
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
Best of LAist