Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Appeals Court Approves L.A. County's Bid To Temporarily Block Reopening Of Aliso Canyon
A state appeals court approved L.A. County's bid to temporarily block re-injecting natural gas into the Aliso Canyon storage facility. The decision came Friday evening, a few hours after Los Angeles Superior Court Judge John Shepard Wiley Jr. rejected the county's bid, claiming he did not have jurisdiction over the matter. This will delay the reopening of the natural gas facility, which was approved for reopening by state regulators last week.
The Aliso Canyon natural gas storage facility had the largest methane leak in national history. It lasted from October 2015 to February 2016 and sickened or forced evacuations of many Porter Ranch residents in northwest San Fernando Valley. Governor Jerry Brown declared a State of Emergency over the leak in January 2016. Even after the leak was capped, there have been almost 950 complaints of nosebleeds, headaches, and nausea in the area since March 2016, according to L.A. Daily News.
The County sued state regulators and Southern California Gas Co. back in March, claiming the state had not done comprehensive safety and environmental reviews. The suit was amended after regulators announced Aliso Canyon could reopen; this time, the County requested documents be turned over and demanded a stay of the decision to reopen the facility, according to the L.A. Times.
The County argues the facility shouldn't reopen until a full study is completed regarding the cause of the leak in 2015 and a full geographic survey is conducted on the facility, considering its location on top of the Santa Susana fault line, according to City News Service.
Support for LAist comes from
Judge Wiley's decision rejected these new lawsuit demands, but County attorneys immediately submitted emergency filings to the state court of appeals, according to City News Service. SoCalGas and state gas and oil officials have until 6 p.m. Saturday to file motions against the temporary stay, according to the L.A. Times.
In response to the temporary stay, Los Angeles County Supervisor Kathryn Barger said in a statement how "[t]his ruling recognizes that there are still significant issues that need to be considered by the Court before reinjection is allowed at the Aliso Canyon facility, including an analysis for the root-cause of the massive 2015 blowout, seismic risk assessments, and a long-term energy reliability study." Porter Ranch residents agree; after the initial Friday afternoon ruling rejecting the temporary stay, Mike Pakucko of the activist organization Save Porter Ranch told the L.A. Daily News "I’m sick to my stomach," and “[t]he judge can’t read." Other activists who attended the hearing emerged confused about the ruling. Deirdre Bolona of Porter Ranch expressed her frustration, telling the L.A. Times, "This is a slap in the face of the citizens of the San Fernando Valley — and beyond."
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago. -
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
Best of LAist