Support for LAist comes from
Local and national news, NPR, things to do, food recommendations and guides to Los Angeles, Orange County and the Inland Empire
Stay Connected
Listen

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Pro-Business, Big Oil, Alcohol Industries Fund Prop 26, Unions Fight Against It

Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.

prop-26-funding.jpg
Industries that support Prop 26 | Chart via MAPLight.org
()


Industries that support Prop 26 | Chart via MAPLight.org
Among the nine propositions Californians will be voting on in the November 2nd election, Prop 26 is not getting much attention. How could it, though? Taxing rules, when compared with marijuana, state parks and climate, is not exactly a sexy topic. But that doesn't mean it's important and could mean major change for the state.

Basically, Prop 26 "expands the definition of a tax and a tax increase so that more proposals would require approval by two-thirds of the Legislature or by local voters," according to the state's legislative analyst. That is to say, it changes some things that are not currently considered a tax, such as fees and property charges, to become a tax, thus going through a more rigorous process to be approved.

"Generally, the types of fees and charges that would become taxes under the measure are ones that government imposes to address health, environmental, or other societal or economic concerns," continues the analysis, which notes fees on alcohol retailers, hazardous materials and oil recycling would be considered taxes when introduced, thus needing a two-thirds vote, which is much harder garner support for (especially in a state so politically paralyzed).

Support for LAist comes from
()


Industries/Groups funding the campaign against Prop 26 by industry | Chart via MAPLight.org
Additionally, any taxpayer -- yes, any taxpayer, no matter how big or small of an industry -- that will have their taxes increased will need to secure a two-thirds vote. Depending on the situation, it will be a vote of the legislature (statewide tax) or the people (local tax).

A total of about $13 million, mostly by the Yes on 26 folks, has been raised for the proposition, and today, campaign funding database MapLIGHT has published a break down of who's funding which side.

"Ballot measures write laws that California citizens will live under for years to come," said Daniel Newman, MAPLight.org's executive director. "California voters deserve to know who is spending millions of dollars to influence laws in our state. MAPLight.org's new Prop. 26 webpage shines a light on the money fueling the debate surrounding this proposed law."

By industry and interest, high-rolling proponents of Prop 23 include pro-businss ($4.7 million from the likes of the California Chamber of Commerce and others), oil and gas ($3.8 million from companies like Chevron, ConocoPhillips and Occidental Petroleum, for example) and alcohol producers (Anheuser-Busch, MillerCoors, etc.).

On the other side of the issue are various unions, which has raisd $1.8 million total. The biggest donors include the California State Council of Service Employees ($500,000) and the California Teachers Association ($254,000).

Via Ballotpedia, only a handful of newspapers have endorsed Prop 26, including the Orange County Register and Long Beach Press Telegram. The editorial opposition, however, is a longer list and includes the LA Times, L.A. Daily News, Sacramento Bee, Ventura County Star, San Gabriel Valley Tribune, Fresno Bee and Bakersfield Californian.

As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.

Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.

We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.

No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.

Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.

Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist