Support for LAist comes from
Local and national news, NPR, things to do, food recommendations and guides to Los Angeles, Orange County and the Inland Empire
Stay Connected
Listen

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Ain't She Sweet

Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.

()

L.A. based writer Caitlin Flanagan gets profiled, and demonstrates some of the more hypocritical aspects of her personality, in this month's Elle. Ms. Flanagan has been criticized before, in places like Beverly-Hills based Ms., but the Elle article is particularly well-written, and Elle is not generally known for having a set political agenda, unless you count the trumpeting of one shoe designer over another. (Thanks to Salon.com's Broadsheet for pointing it out.)

Both articles address some controversies over Ms. Flanagan's opinions about women who work as professionals rather than stay home with their children. All right, that is a consistently controversial subject, but if she really wants to stay home with her kids and takes pride in it, fine, good for her. But both of these articles contest her ideas while praising her writing style, which is, in fact, barf-inducing.

In the introduction to the anthology The Art of the Personal Essay, its editor Phillip Lopate writes, "So often the "plot" of a personal essay, its drama, its suspense, consists in watching how far the essayist can drop past his or her psychic defenses toward deeper levels of honesty." He adds that the essayist's job is to explore the contradictory self, in fact, that "The harvesting of self-contraction is an intrinsic part of the personal essay form."

Support for LAist comes from

The thing about Flanagan is that on the surface she seems, like a great essayist, to introspect, to explore shadowy aspects of her own character. For example, this excerpt from the controversial "Serfdom" essay:

It was entirely snotty and rude and most of all silly for me to have this attitude toward those mothers. In the first place, the day-care center was in no way tony, nor were the cars that pulled up to it in any way luxurious; I'll bet that all those mothers worked more because of economic necessity than because of a desire for professional advancement or emotional fulfillment. More to the point, a majority of my sainted hours noting every little moue of delight or displeasure that crossed my children's faces were spent in the company of a highly capable and very industrious nanny who did all of the hard stuff. There was no need for me to be moping around the apartment all day; I really could have lightened up and had a little more fun, clicked off the TV and gone to the movies or lunch or shopping.

See, she admits to behavior both snotty and silly. Because, silly her, she forgot for a moment that not everyone can afford a nanny, or to go shopping in the middle of the day! But she admits to it! Isn't she sensitive? Doesn't she, being so sensitive and honest, deserve her coddled life? In case you are wondering, all the introspection in all of the four or so of Ms. Flanagan's essays we read in the New Yorker before learning to recognize the name and quickly flip the page doesn't get deeper than this: Caitlin Flanagan introspects, feels sensitive, and ultimately decides not to change anything about her life (which is, by the way, better than yours) or, really, her point of view on herself. She's no Joan Didion; she's more like Regina George. Which means she's almost funny, if you can laugh without barfing first.

photo by sectionz via flickr

As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.

Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.

We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.

No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.

Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.

Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist